Epstein Files

Its some woman with all her quotes about fucked up MP,s labour etc.. some crackers
She's really good to be honest. She follows me on Twitter so I'll go in to her feed to see if I can find it.
 
I think we can safely say that the idea that satanic pedophiles were serving up children to democrats from the basement of a pizza shop that didn't and doesn't have a basement, based on the most convoluted 'interpretation' imaginable of some emails, is indeed crazy.

Crazy yes, but would you 100% rule it out?
 
Crazy yes, but would you 100% rule it out?
Well yes I would, if you mean the original pizzagate thing. I am 100% confident that satanic democrats were not ordering children out of the basement of a pizza shop without a basement.

What Epstein was up to, feck knows. @FTJT references some interesting stuff about Epstein's connection to some 4chan goon, but I doubt it's more than coincidence.

But even if that has legs as some kind of cover for Epstein - which makes zero sense to me, like why would you cover up your clandestine depravity by putting its secret language in the public domain? - I remain 100% confident that the Democrats were not doing what pizzagate alleged. I think it was a wicked lie.
 
Im no detective or political analyst, so only have 1 burning question.
If Andrew Windsor has had his royal titles and residence removed by his own father, when he has so much evidence against him, then why is he still at large?
 
Im no detective or political analyst, so only have 1 burning question.
If Andrew Windsor has had his royal titles and residence removed by his own father, when he has so much evidence against him, then why is he still at large?
He's done plenty of immoral things but has he done anything illegal in British terms? The girls he sleazed were over the UK age of consent is my understanding?
 
Last edited:
In British terms concerns me. Also, these girls have very possibly been trafficked.
Feckin right it's a concern! I thought your point was how is he at large and not behind bars.

That's the only point I'm making: I'm not sure that, repellent as his actions are, that there is a legal case to answer. In the UK that is - the yanks could prosecute him, but I doubt they will.
 
In the files according to the daily heil

1000011923.jpg


Jeffrey Epstein died on Saturday 10th August 2019.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Feckin right it's a concern! I thought your point was how is he at large and not behind bars.

That's the only point I'm making: I'm not sure that, repellent as his actions are, that there is a legal case to answer. In the UK that is - the yanks could prosecute him, but I doubt they will.
That is my point.
 
Shows how our governments are controlled by the Deep State and Israel
No sure about this. I think this is less about the reach of the deep state, and more about the deep state actually being powerless compared to rich guys with malevolent intent.

As far as Epstein being Mossad I think it's jumping ahead a bit. It's certainly plausible - Maxwell sr definitely was, and Epstein was bezzy mates with Ehud Barak and had some questionable income - but not to put too fine a point on it, the main lesson of the files has been that every one of these bastards is crooked in thirty different ways beyond the ones we would have predicted. While 'money launderer with a huge trove of kompromat' is a good occupation for a spy, it's also a natural side effect of being a *&*^ polymath
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
How long til she's pardoned
Could he pardon her? 😬
 
Mental that the release of these files was supposed to bring down Trump but seems more likely to bring down a UK prime minister and potentially the monarchy.

Doesn’t the mass release of these files to the public also reduce the chance of any criminal comvictions? Would they be admissible as evidence in a jury trial? 🤔
 
Mental that the release of these files was supposed to bring down Trump but seems more likely to bring down a UK prime minister and potentially the monarchy.

Doesn’t the mass release of these files to the public also reduce the chance of any criminal comvictions? Would they be admissible as evidence in a jury trial? 🤔
Yep. Said that myself. Maxwell says she’ll cooperate if Trump grants her clemency. Not the legal authorities, Trump. She has all the evidence secreted away somewhere as her insurance policy against what became of her partner in crime. If Trumps lets her out, she’ll be on a plane to Tel Aviv before the media wakes up in the morning and her gratitude to him and his cabal will be to keep it buried.
As for the British establishment, they’ve already got a head start on the bloodletting trying to kid on it’s all for the victims.
 
Mental that the release of these files was supposed to bring down Trump but seems more likely to bring down a UK prime minister and potentially the monarchy.

Doesn’t the mass release of these files to the public also reduce the chance of any criminal comvictions? Would they be admissible as evidence in a jury trial? 🤔
Mental also that these files were originally supposed to implicate the Democrats and used by Trump's squad to do so!

That said the bottom line is Andrew and Mandy have been caught in greater transgressions than any other political figure as far as I know - well maybe th Norwegian fella also. But given another few million files have not been released...

While some Trump loyalists have their fingers in their ears now, I don't think the right wing types will let this go. It could topple Trump yet.
 
Last edited:
Possibly the biggest irony of all here, is you could argue the conspiracy theorists have been proved right in substance, once you strip away the schlock of baby eating satanists. A network of super rich / power class bods really have been peddling influence and greasing wheels amidst sexual depravity.

And an incestuous one - tying together the Democrats, Republicans (including conveniently timed dyke jumping - see Howard Lutnick), and points further right and left.

Then there is the fact that all of it is likely to be dwarfed in severity and scale by our own rape gangs conspiracies - though I remain sceptical we will get near US levels of transparency, however compromised they may be. Even this last week Epstein noise has helped the media ignore accounts from Rupert Lowe's unofficial enquiry into the latter.

There is a lot of rot in the body politic.
 
Last edited:
Yep. Said that myself. Maxwell says she’ll cooperate if Trump grants her clemency. Not the legal authorities, Trump. She has all the evidence secreted away somewhere as her insurance policy against what became of her partner in crime. If Trumps lets her out, she’ll be on a plane to Tel Aviv before the media wakes up in the morning and her gratitude to him and his cabal will be to keep it buried.
As for the British establishment, they’ve already got a head start on the bloodletting trying to kid on it’s all for the victims.
Only the president can grant such pardons as far as I am aware, so that bit is not surprising. Were Trump to grant it, it could be the end of him. The right would go berserk, and so now would the left, who seem ready to cut the Clintons loose.
 
No sure about this. I think this is less about the reach of the deep state, and more about the deep state actually being powerless compared to rich guys with malevolent intent.

As far as Epstein being Mossad I think it's jumping ahead a bit. It's certainly plausible - Maxwell sr definitely was, and Epstein was bezzy mates with Ehud Barak and had some questionable income - but not to put too fine a point on it, the main lesson of the files has been that every one of these bastards is crooked in thirty different ways beyond the ones we would have predicted. While 'money launderer with a huge trove of kompromat' is a good occupation for a spy, it's also a natural side effect of being a *&*^ polymath
Fair point. Here's a CIA whistleblower giving his opinion - believes Epstein was indeed Mossad, and given funds etc to ensnare. (sorry it's Bartlett)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Fair point. Here's a CIA whistleblower giving his opinion - believes Epstein was indeed Mossad, and given funds etc to ensnare. (sorry it's Bartlett)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Ah, the manosphere again. I am watching with interest the sources heretofore impeccably right on citizens are now consulting. Now it's become useful an all.
 
Ah, the manosphere again. I am watching with interest the sources heretofore impeccably right on citizens are now consulting. Now it's become useful an all.
Haha.. the CIA guy genuinely did jail time for grassing the yanks on torture. Decent source imo
 
Haha.. the CIA guy genuinely did jail time for grassing the yanks on torture. Decent source imo
At least you aren't quoting Tucker Carlson yet KiGers!

More seriously it's good to see people opening their minds, even if opportunistically - though this domain needs treated with the same care as the Guardian: the ratio of manufactured narrative and outright fantasy, is high.

Ive no interest in a LinkedIn gobshite like Bartlett so can't speak for him specifically.
 
The leader of the free world having a good ol' time with his mate and young girls. We don't need to invent Pizzagate...

1770736987257.png
 
The leader of the free world having a good ol' time with his mate and young girls. We don't need to invent Pizzagate...

View attachment 20957
Well I guess you don't need to make up that if you make up this. But is circulating AI generated fakes really any different than the liars behind pizzagate B?

Was there ever any difference between them and many of their critics, or as ever, is it only about which tribal interests are at stake?

The latent ryanisation of the board has fair come to the surface over the last week or two.
 
Well I guess you don't need to make up that if you make up this. But is circulating AI generated fakes really any different than the liars behind pizzagate B?

Was there ever any difference between them and many of their critics, or as ever, is it only about which tribal interests are at stake?

The latent ryanisation of the board has fair come to the surface over the last week or two.
How does you I or anybody know/prove if an image is ai generated or not?
Regardless, even if that image is genuine, it proves nothing of an illegal nature.
It insinuates that they are a bunch of sleazy old men, but we know that anyway.
 
How does you I or anybody know/prove if an image is ai generated or not?
Regardless, even if that image is genuine, it proves nothing of an illegal nature.
It insinuates that they are a bunch of sleazy old men, but we know that anyway.
Do an image search. Always worth doing if something seems to good to be true, in stroking an agenda. It's reported as such all over the Internet even if it isn't obvious when you want to believe.

Where are Epsteins legs?
 
The big giveaway is that Trumpets shins look fine.
must be fake.
 
The stuff contained here on how Epstein and a moneyman mate of his manipulated Fergie (and ergo Andrew?) I thought was pretty unreal:


Few sinister bits I noticed:

He apparently warned Epstein that Ferguson was in the "middle east" where "chances are she is with people who take advantage of her once again".

"Treating her as cheating girlfriend is working"


And then really weird, the guy who founded Phones4U offered to clear her £10million debt in exchange for half of all her future earnings??!

This all gets weirder and weirder. Interesting though!