- Joined
- Nov 15, 2005
What does it say? I tried to open it and got a message saying "This page is not supported"Brilliant Billy![]()
What does it say? I tried to open it and got a message saying "This page is not supported"Brilliant Billy![]()
Its some woman with all her quotes about fucked up MP,s labour etc.. some crackersWhat does it say? I tried to open it and got a message saying "This page is not supported"
It says "Dinny tell Dub."What does it say? I tried to open it and got a message saying "This page is not supported"
She's really good to be honest. She follows me on Twitter so I'll go in to her feed to see if I can find it.Its some woman with all her quotes about fucked up MP,s labour etc.. some crackers
I think we can safely say that the idea that satanic pedophiles were serving up children to democrats from the basement of a pizza shop that didn't and doesn't have a basement, based on the most convoluted 'interpretation' imaginable of some emails, is indeed crazy.
Well yes I would, if you mean the original pizzagate thing. I am 100% confident that satanic democrats were not ordering children out of the basement of a pizza shop without a basement.Crazy yes, but would you 100% rule it out?
He's done plenty of immoral things but has he done anything illegal in British terms? The girls he sleazed were over the UK age of consent is my understanding?Im no detective or political analyst, so only have 1 burning question.
If Andrew Windsor has had his royal titles and residence removed by his own father, when he has so much evidence against him, then why is he still at large?
Feckin right it's a concern! I thought your point was how is he at large and not behind bars.In British terms concerns me. Also, these girls have very possibly been trafficked.
RIPCould be rather interesting, but probably more nothing to see here from the despicable vile beast.
Maxwell up in front of congress tomorrow..
![]()
I helped bring down Ghislaine Maxwell. She has evidence that could finish Andrew — The i Paper
Sigrid McCawley, who represented Virginia Giuffre, says her interview with Jeffrey Epstein's former madam was like nothing else she's experiencedapple.news
That is my point.Feckin right it's a concern! I thought your point was how is he at large and not behind bars.
That's the only point I'm making: I'm not sure that, repellent as his actions are, that there is a legal case to answer. In the UK that is - the yanks could prosecute him, but I doubt they will.
He could be in hotter water now. Apparently been sharing insider info a la MandelsonThat is my point.
No sure about this. I think this is less about the reach of the deep state, and more about the deep state actually being powerless compared to rich guys with malevolent intent.Shows how our governments are controlled by the Deep State and Israel
Yep. Said that myself. Maxwell says she’ll cooperate if Trump grants her clemency. Not the legal authorities, Trump. She has all the evidence secreted away somewhere as her insurance policy against what became of her partner in crime. If Trumps lets her out, she’ll be on a plane to Tel Aviv before the media wakes up in the morning and her gratitude to him and his cabal will be to keep it buried.Mental that the release of these files was supposed to bring down Trump but seems more likely to bring down a UK prime minister and potentially the monarchy.
Doesn’t the mass release of these files to the public also reduce the chance of any criminal comvictions? Would they be admissible as evidence in a jury trial?![]()
Mental also that these files were originally supposed to implicate the Democrats and used by Trump's squad to do so!Mental that the release of these files was supposed to bring down Trump but seems more likely to bring down a UK prime minister and potentially the monarchy.
Doesn’t the mass release of these files to the public also reduce the chance of any criminal comvictions? Would they be admissible as evidence in a jury trial?![]()
Only the president can grant such pardons as far as I am aware, so that bit is not surprising. Were Trump to grant it, it could be the end of him. The right would go berserk, and so now would the left, who seem ready to cut the Clintons loose.Yep. Said that myself. Maxwell says she’ll cooperate if Trump grants her clemency. Not the legal authorities, Trump. She has all the evidence secreted away somewhere as her insurance policy against what became of her partner in crime. If Trumps lets her out, she’ll be on a plane to Tel Aviv before the media wakes up in the morning and her gratitude to him and his cabal will be to keep it buried.
As for the British establishment, they’ve already got a head start on the bloodletting trying to kid on it’s all for the victims.
Fair point. Here's a CIA whistleblower giving his opinion - believes Epstein was indeed Mossad, and given funds etc to ensnare. (sorry it's Bartlett)No sure about this. I think this is less about the reach of the deep state, and more about the deep state actually being powerless compared to rich guys with malevolent intent.
As far as Epstein being Mossad I think it's jumping ahead a bit. It's certainly plausible - Maxwell sr definitely was, and Epstein was bezzy mates with Ehud Barak and had some questionable income - but not to put too fine a point on it, the main lesson of the files has been that every one of these bastards is crooked in thirty different ways beyond the ones we would have predicted. While 'money launderer with a huge trove of kompromat' is a good occupation for a spy, it's also a natural side effect of being a *&*^ polymath
Fair point. Here's a CIA whistleblower giving his opinion - believes Epstein was indeed Mossad, and given funds etc to ensnare. (sorry it's Bartlett)
Haha.. the CIA guy genuinely did jail time for grassing the yanks on torture. Decent source imoAh, the manosphere again. I am watching with interest the sources heretofore impeccably right on citizens are now consulting. Now it's become useful an all.
At least you aren't quoting Tucker Carlson yet KiGers!Haha.. the CIA guy genuinely did jail time for grassing the yanks on torture. Decent source imo
Well I guess you don't need to make up that if you make up this. But is circulating AI generated fakes really any different than the liars behind pizzagate B?The leader of the free world having a good ol' time with his mate and young girls. We don't need to invent Pizzagate...
View attachment 20957
See post #238In the files according to the daily heil
View attachment 20948
Jeffrey Epstein died on Saturday 10th August 2019.
How does you I or anybody know/prove if an image is ai generated or not?Well I guess you don't need to make up that if you make up this. But is circulating AI generated fakes really any different than the liars behind pizzagate B?
Was there ever any difference between them and many of their critics, or as ever, is it only about which tribal interests are at stake?
The latent ryanisation of the board has fair come to the surface over the last week or two.
Do an image search. Always worth doing if something seems to good to be true, in stroking an agenda. It's reported as such all over the Internet even if it isn't obvious when you want to believe.How does you I or anybody know/prove if an image is ai generated or not?
Regardless, even if that image is genuine, it proves nothing of an illegal nature.
It insinuates that they are a bunch of sleazy old men, but we know that anyway.
Looks like Epstein got legless, and the lass in the red skirt could touch her toes without bending over.The leader of the free world having a good ol' time with his mate and young girls. We don't need to invent Pizzagate...
View attachment 20957
Looks like Epstein got legless, and the lass in the red skirt could touch her toes without bending over.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.