- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
Make a change.I'm talking sense.

Make a change.I'm talking sense.

How many thousands of jobs for Scotland was it Jimmy?And I thought Milliband had set up a government leccy thingy?
So that's no a private company.

Scottish Power and others do these offers because electricity is cheap at these times. It also encourages use when there is less demand. If the demand was there it would be supplied. What I think is happening is the wind farm electricity can be more expensive than other sources.Archie I'm being told by Scottish power that I get half price leccy between 11 and 4 at the weekend if I don't use too much leccy through the week.
So I need leccy. So why no supply the demand for folk?
The energy market is very complex. Renewables even more so given the mix of subsidies and guaranteed prices.So demand is nearly 32 and we generate nearly 28.
Yet we have turned our supply off according to the link I put up.
Fuck me this is confusing.
It isn't always more expensive - depends on day to day market conditions. There's also a strategy to build renewable capacity for range of reasons: lower emissions; energy security; alternative to nuclear and so on.If it's to expensive then why bother doing it?
Much of it is built now. I'm not a big fan of nuclear, but I have to recognise that France didn't have the big price jumps that other countries had as a result of the Ukraine war. Much of that is due to their large nuclear provision.I'll be deid before any of that gets built in this country![]()
Expensive; waste; Scottish Government totally opposed.So if nuclear is alright then why are we no building more nuclear leccy type things?
Bitchy!Make a change.![]()
So if nuclear is alright then why are we no building more nuclear leccy type things?
It just reads ridiculous that we generate enough power but close it down and buy power in.
And how they run there train services.Maybe we should be looking at how other countries provide power to their population. Its fairly obvious Westminster hasn't a clue. Martin Lewis has been campaigning for change for a few years now.
And so much more. You'd think when they came over here and bought up Britain buy the pound they'd have brought over the good practice rather than rinsing the UK for all it's worth.And how they run there train services.
Well, since you ask, I can tell you a bit about NL oc.And how they run there train services.
There’s a decent explainer in this thread of tweets….
Dunno about that but my daughter and her partner bought a house with solar panels and they get between £200 and £300 back every year which is not to be sniffed at. At my time of life though, I’d never get back the initial investment - wish I’d thought about it years ago.I see all the new houses being built all have solar panels. Do the occupants get their leccy free?
I remember when there was companies installing and telling you you got money back but I thought that all got stopped.Dunno about that but my daughter and her partner bought a house with solar panels and they get between £200 and £300 back every year which is not to be sniffed at. At my time of life though, I’d never get back the initial investment - wish I’d thought about it years ago.
It's the cost of production that's critical.It just reads ridiculous that we generate enough power but close it down and buy power in.
You're making it sound as though the energycrisispolicy hasn't been thought through!
They're actually doing something huge at Loch Ness. Basically, when there's lots of excess power as you describe and it's cheap, they're going to pump millions of gallons of water to another Loch up the hill. When there's a demand for power that water goes through a few turbines back into Loch Ness and, VOILA, electricity for the grid!
Goodness knows how long it will take to build but I suspect, even if they have to move Ben Nevis over a bit, it will be long before the nuclear crap at Hinckley.
It abosutely is an issue. The renewables industry is being built on two pillars of subsidy: direct subsidy to build renewable generation; and guaranteed prices for generators. So consumers do pay more. But that's the long term game to build the generation capacity.But we also generate enough to run the country through almost purely renewables. While being able to export around third of that to the rest of the UK.
I'm only looking at Scotland, so dunno about the wider UK, but energy in Scotland isn't an issue.
The costs of building battery storage for all that excess, plus replacing the batteries every however many years, and the infrastructure to support all of that, would vastly dwarf what you're all talking about up there.
The feed in tariff incentive was cut, but it can still be worth doing.I remember when there was companies installing and telling you you got money back but I thought that all got stopped.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is a very long term ambition. There is a very limited supply of hydrogen cars and the retooling of industry will take donkeys years and will be expensive. It doesn't offer much now.it’s crazy- we could be using that power to produce hydrogen that could then fuel industry and cars (apparently BMW are focussing on hydrogen not batteries to power their future cars).
Mibbes for younger folks, I'm too auld tae get it done now.The feed in tariff incentive was cut, but it can still be worth doing.
It abosutely is an issue. The renewables industry is being built on two pillars of subsidy: direct subsidy to build renewable generation; and guaranteed prices for generators. So consumers do pay more. But that's the long term game to build the generation capacity.
So the critical point is price. If it's cheaper to buy elsewhere and turn off wind generation then that's what will happen.
I'm not saying I like the system, I'm just setting out what it is.
I think you're calling that right.Mibbes for younger folks, I'm too auld tae get it done now.
Wind isn't always the cheapest. The gas issue was that it's price was tied to electricity because it was used to generate power. When the Ukraine war broke out prices went through the roof and the rest is history.It shouldn't be an issue then.
We generate more than we use, 90% of our energy is wind or nuclear, two cheapest forms of energy.
We get screwed because of the fossil fuel prices, fuels that we don't or barely even use.
I know next to nothing about the suppliers, buying from generators etc, so you're no doubt right.
So we need more generators up here? We're too far away from them despite sending all our energy to them? Is that how that works?
HSBC has become the first UK bank to leave the global banking industry’s net zero target-setting group. HSBC was a founding member of the NZBA at its launch in 2021, with the bank’s then chief executive, Noel Quinn, saying it was vital to “establish a robust and transparent framework for monitoring progress” towards net zero carbon-emission targets.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.