egb_hibs
Private Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2002
This whole thing must have happens during my sabbatical. It keeps coming up and I have no idea wtf is going on lola peeking duck sitting oot front.
but he is OK. I got him out just in time.
This whole thing must have happens during my sabbatical. It keeps coming up and I have no idea wtf is going on lola peeking duck sitting oot front.
but he is OK. I got him out just in time.
Its dead easy....if Raul is a serial rapist then he goes. it's not a caricature, its real.Who are the goodies though? A coalition of the upper middle class interests intent on dividing the less well off so as to rule and pump them, inexorably squeezing the life out of democracy and turning truth inside out to gaslight a nation ....well they don't immediately strike me as the good guys. Its not obvious that a single malign behaviour of the Trump bams hasn't been done by them first and with far more power in their side. Im sure there will be some peripheral examples, but not enough to change the fact they are the prime movers.
Well it does if you want to resort to simpleton caricatures. How is this different from saying its all about Raul, a serial rapist, who democrat governors contemptuous of the rule of law, will protect to the detriment of everyone else?
Correct me if I'm wrong but my understanding is that 'sanctuary cities' such as LA set out to thwart the law in respect of deportation of any migrants whether complying with positive or negative stereotypes, or the overwhelming majority who fall in between?Its dead easy....if Raul is a serial rapist then he goes. it's not a caricature, its real.
the problem is trumpet wants to treat them all the same.....the boy that washes the cars and contributes gets eliminated along wi yon rapist. In most cases before yon rapist who they cannae find.
Don't know if Cummings is just going banzai but at 24.30 he alludes to widespread cover ups of grooming gangs including councils trying to get the government to stop the times investigation that brought the issue into the mainstream.
@Bossie he also explains the ponzi scheme nature of the treasury's mass migration approach, as reflected in the blurb you quoted the other day. Ie they bring migrants in for an immediate tax hit then as they age and go on to be a cost - which on average they very substantially are over a lifetime - they intend to import new waves to cover it. Utterly unsustainable.
The hard left have the same priorities as the free market right. Perhaps they have slightly different motives for that, but the end result is the same. That is why they have ended up as metaphorical strikebreakers. Of course they're going to oppose Cummings shining a light on rape gangs, they want to cover them up.It's pretty incredible a lot of the stuff he's been saying recently in interviews. I've not yet watched this latest one but I find it incredible that those on the hard left dismiss him.
The hard left have the same priorities as the free market right. Perhaps they have slightly different motives for that, but the end result is the same. That is why they have ended up as metaphorical strikebreakers. Of course they're going to oppose Cummings shining a light on rape gangs, they want to cover them up.
Don't know if Cummings is just going banzai but at 24.30 he alludes to widespread cover ups of grooming gangs including councils trying to get the government to stop the times investigation that brought the issue into the mainstream.
@Bossie he also explains the ponzi scheme nature of the treasury's mass migration approach, as reflected in the blurb you quoted the other day. Ie they bring migrants in for an immediate tax hit then as they age and go on to be a cost - which on average they very substantially are over a lifetime - they intend to import new waves to cover it. Utterly unsustainable.
I suspect you're not wrong, even though it is from the horses mouth without edit. The post truth community don't recognise such distinctions.Sorry @egb_hibs GB News. Won't believe it until I read it in the Guardian or on the BBC. You know, reliable, objective sources.
A Democratic state politician has been killed and another has been injured after "targeted shootings" in the US, officials sayLinks no opening mate. But I did see a couple of politicos had been shot.
The last sentence caused a double take! That's absolutely horrific. Sounds quite organised as well, fake police uniform etc.A Democratic state politician has been killed and another has been injured after "targeted shootings" in the US, officials say
Melissa Hortman and her husband have been killed, he says. John Hoffman and his wife are recovering after surgery, he adds
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz says the attacks at the lawmakers' homes in two towns near Minneapolis "appears to be a politically motivated assassination"
The suspect is believed to have impersonated a police officer and escaped after engaging fire with officers, police say
The shootings took place in Champlin and Brooklyn Park, two neighbouring cities near Minneapolis
A shelter-in-place order has been issued by Brooklyn Park Police Department for a three-mile (4.8 km) radius of Edinburgh Golf Course
No .See all the trouble going on in America just now?
Is that an insurrection?
How?No .
I think you are mixing up protests and trying to overthrow a government. You don't think January 6 was an insurrection. I do. Equally I wouldn't discuss the Southport riots as an insurrection either."What are you referring to? Protests?"
No. Riots. Just like what is happening over the water just now.
Trying to overthrow a governmentI think you are mixing up protests and trying to overthrow a government. You don't think January 6 was an insurrection. I do. Equally I wouldn't discuss the Southport riots as an insurrection either.

Was it trying to stop the peaceful transfer of power? Was it incited by a president trying to fiddle the election? Talk about false equivalence.Trying to overthrow a government
A couple of hundred dafties entered a centre of political power. Something the democrat dafties have a wet dream about.
Take to the streets cried the democrats. Show you are angry and want change they wailed.
Wail folk have done what we dream about but they are the wrong type of folk.....
View attachment 18227
Was this an 'insurrection' then Archie?
And what, pray tell, of the democrats conspiring with the three letter agencies to aid the Biden campaign and smear the Trump one. The democrats dont need oiks on the street to do their work for them, even if they had any oiks left among their support.Was it trying to stop the peaceful transfer of power? Was it incited by a president trying to fiddle the election? Talk about false equivalence.
The Washington Post article is an opinion piece by a right wing Republican. It is not a news report. The Madison Wisconsin issue was protests about union busting laws and attacks on workers. It was effectively an industrial dispute with workers facing down a hard right governor. It was not about the transfer of power. And the state Capitol was not stormed with the intent of killing a politician.No I'm using my posts the way you use yours Archie.
So rioting against one Capitol is righteous but rioting against another Capitol is insurrection?
![]()
They certainly are. Point well made. Jan 6 was the biggest and worst .Thanks to Morrissey for this.....
From the ice-age, to the dole-age
There is but one concern
I have just discovered
Some insurrections are bigger than others
Some insurrections are bigger than others
Some insurrection rioters are bigger than other insurrections rioters
95% of American journalists are liberals iirc. Youve just described most of current affairs output in the US media, albeit im reverseThe Washington Post article is an opinion piece by a right wing Republican. It is not a news report.
They were trying to thwart the democratic process Archie. They were celebrated for it by senior democratsThe Madison Wisconsin issue was protests about union busting laws and attacks on workers. It was effectively an industrial dispute with workers facing down a hard right governor. It was not about the transfer of power. And the state Capitol was not stormed with the intent of killing a politician.
Who has said Jan 6 was nothing? Please feel free to cite anyone here or even anyone in the world. Otherwise please stop making things up. You do it constantly.It was, however, assign of things to come. Aggressive anti union tactics from politicians who try to rush changes through. Pushback from workers. Support for union busting from the Tea party and other republicans. Sarah Plain showing up. In other words a shit show.
I know Trump apologists will do anything to claim Jan 6 was nothing. And part of that is scrabbling around to find examples that they can claim make that point. But Jan 6 was unparalleled and no amount of whataboutery will change that.
And I thought you would be for the workers?
Bigger and worser than mostly peaceful protests that killed dozens and caused billions of dollars worth of damage?They certainly are. Point well made. Jan 6 was the biggest and worst .
I'm not clear what you mean. I don't support violent protest. Are you saying you are on the side of the January 6 rioters?Na BLM was the worst for innocent citizens and yep I do support the workers.
The ones in Madison could have destroyed the Capitol and it would have been ok by me as long as workers benefited.
Maybe the rioters at the Capitol in Washington were way ahead of the curve and seen Biden was a dithering fool who wanted to shaft working folk?
Who knows.
And opinion piece or not. A Capitol got stormed but it was by the right (and I'm on their side) type of stormers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.