That jews set out to murder children. It goes back a long long way and has been de rigeur again in recent times.
What name did I call you?
I'd call it a tragedy and a monumental and horrific fuck up. Murder, however, is intentional killing. If we are to redefine it like we have seemingly redefined genocide, it begs the question why?
Another question might be why you have already spilled more words on this incident than on 30k people murdered by regime - and a chunk of the words you have issued on the latter, appeared to be focused on calling the figure into question with a dig at the you-know-whos.
Earlier in the thread you also spilled more words on Palestine than on that massacre, despite the thread being about Iran.
Its strange behaviour, though you are obviously not alone.
What narrative? I'm not ignoring anything. I don't know what went on in these talks but am happy to theorise they were a diversion while America readied itself to go after its main enemy after China - who can't be fought this way - as I suspect the people behind Trump have been itching to do, and Iran gave them the pretext. That may be right or wrong, but it seems a credible hypothesis to me.
That wars are started to change the front pages I am less persuaded by. Not least wars that will be deeply unpopular with Trump's voter base. I mean things rarely happen for a single reason but tbh I think Trump's mob taking the opportunity to pursue a longstanding geopolitical goal seems likely to be the central one. I think that's what starting with the observable facts suggests, rather than the requirements of a self fulfilling narrative.