- Joined
- Jun 18, 2022
Bloody phone putting millions rather that billionsIt’s a golden opportunity to tear into them mate yes.
Really makes you wonder why he isn’t… and btw mate, it’s £billions![]()
Bloody phone putting millions rather that billionsIt’s a golden opportunity to tear into them mate yes.
Really makes you wonder why he isn’t… and btw mate, it’s £billions![]()
The Labour party wont be too noisy.Do you not think then Stu that Starmer and his government should be doing more to highlight this?
They have been very quiet about the missing £millions.
Anyone would think that THEY had something to hide.
aye ya radge... frae the same folk!!!Have you not noticed the relentless attacks on Labour? On this very board too!
I don't think there should be a public inquiry unless it can be established that public money is involved. Why do you think many nationalists appear to want revenge?Nobody outwith the party, or folk who contributed, has been affected though so it’s really got fuck all to do with the unionist mouthpieces. Murrell has admitted guilt and is to be sentenced. All this clamour for further enquiries, to cost further millions at public expense, is for two reasons only. Firstly to get revenge against the former first minister because she was head and shoulders above every Westminster politician over her tenure and secondly to give them leverage to shut the Scottish parliament down.
Do you not think then Stu that Starmer and his government should be doing more to highlight this?
They have been very quiet about the missing £millions.
Anyone would think that THEY had something to hide.
That's the cost of transparency. And it includes Whatsapp messages! There's a thing.The Labour party wont be too noisy.
The Mandelson caper has cost over a million already.
Is that why Starmer ignored the warnings from various persons?That's the cost of transparency. And it includes Whatsapp messages! There's a thing.
Was it no the government that parted with the cash to the scammers?![]()
Lords watchdog launches inquiry into Michelle Mone over ‘VIP lane’ contract - London Daily
Investigation into Tory peer relates to PPE company awarded £203m in government contractslondondaily.com
Of course he's not above scrutiny. No politician should be. And the fact you can read this is a sign of it. I think Starmer made a terrible decision. But I can see reasoning, flawed as it turned out.Is that why Starmer ignored the warnings from various persons?
He didnt give a shit? Or he is above scrutiny?
I dont think there is a politician walking this planet who wants transparency on their watch.
I think it relates to her being a peer.Was it no the government that parted with the cash to the scammers?
Or did the lord's have to approve it first?
So the lord's can bin her then?I think it relates to her being a peer.
Nah - I think that boat has sailed.So the lord's can bin her then?
But who is it that would need to get the ball rolling over recovering the cash?
Might I suggest a SAS operation that cannot be confirmed nor denied to satisfy the public clamour for justice to be done in her case?Nah - I think that boat has sailed.
BBC News - Michelle Mone-linked PPE firm liquidated and unlikely to repay £148m - BBC News
![]()
Michelle Mone-linked PPE firm liquidated and unlikely to repay £148m
The firm led by Baroness Mone's husband Douglas Barrowman breached a contract to supply surgical gowns during the Covid pandemic.www.bbc.co.uk
I can neither confirm or deny...Might I suggest a SAS operation that cannot be confirmed nor denied to satisfy the public clamour for justice to be done in her case?
His 'reasoning' will cost him.Of course he's not above scrutiny. No politician should be. And the fact you can read this is a sign of it. I think Starmer made a terrible decision. But I can see reasoning, flawed as it turned out.
Maybe - we'll see.His 'reasoning' will cost him.
He's done for.
Archie with all due respect can you explain what reasoning you can see for appointing a duplicitous, twice sacked, lying friend of a paedophile that everybody knew about to the top UK ambassadorial role.Of course he's not above scrutiny. No politician should be. And the fact you can read this is a sign of it. I think Starmer made a terrible decision. But I can see reasoning, flawed as it turned out.
Probably the same reasoning that former Police Sergeant Jack Denny was hand picked as a Parliamentary Candidate for reform by Nigel Farage for Leicestershire after finishing his sentence.Archie with all due respect can you explain what reasoning you can see for appointing a duplicitous, twice sacked, lying friend of a paedophile that everybody knew about to the top UK ambassadorial role.
His ability to manage and engage with the Trump White House.Archie with all due respect can you explain what reasoning you can see for appointing a duplicitous, twice sacked, lying friend of a paedophile that everybody knew about to the top UK ambassadorial role.
Probably because his nonce buddy in the good ol’ USA demanded his appointment and the uk government doesn’t run the country.Archie with all due respect can you explain what reasoning you can see for appointing a duplicitous, twice sacked, lying friend of a paedophile that everybody knew about to the top UK ambassadorial role.
Did he?Probably because his nonce buddy in the good ol’ USA demanded his appointment and the uk government doesn’t run the country.
Just had tae mention reform eh? Farage isnae prime minister and he wisnae appointing Denny tae the top U.K. diplomatic post.Probably the same reasoning that former Police Sergeant Jack Denny was hand picked as a Parliamentary Candidate for reform by Nigel Farage for Leicestershire after finishing his sentence.
Classic, even for you. You completely missed the point. Im showing you up for YOUR whataboutery.Just had tae mention reform eh? Farage isnae prime minister and he wisnae appointing Denny tae the top U.K. diplomatic post.
That’s some level of whitabootery even for you
I happen tae think farage would be a disaster as PM, I also think starmer IS a disaster as PM and I can't see that any of the baying mob calling for his removal would be an improvement.Classic, even for you. You completely missed the point. Im showing you up for YOUR whataboutery.
You try and score points against folks like Archie because you are hate labour, where your side, and they are your side, are exactly the same, and often worse. Thats the level you're at. Consistently.
The principle is EXACTLY the same, whether one is the cleaner or one is the chief exec.
Probably met him on Epsteins Island.Probably because his nonce buddy in the good ol’ USA demanded his appointment and the uk government doesn’t run the country.
is the answer right wingI happen tae think farage would be a disaster as PM, I also think starmer IS a disaster as PM and I can't see that any of the baying mob calling for his removal would be an improvement.
The leader I think talks the most sense at the moment is Kemi. Unfortunately she's a tory.
One guy that talks a good arguement is zia yousef but he's not an MP.
I also rip the current leadership and policies of the SNP tae shreds despite having been an independence supporter since the mid 70s. I dont think they do anything for Scotland.
So clever clogs( no offence haarlem), pick my politics out of that lot

Maybe you should be asking whats happening in the country thats pointing people towards reform rather than just calling them right wing racists.is the answer right wing![]()
What is it you like about Kemi Badenoch? Obviously I'm a Labour voter, but I've not seen her as particularly impressive.I happen tae think farage would be a disaster as PM, I also think starmer IS a disaster as PM and I can't see that any of the baying mob calling for his removal would be an improvement.
The leader I think talks the most sense at the moment is Kemi. Unfortunately she's a tory.
One guy that talks a good arguement is zia yousef but he's not an MP.
I also rip the current leadership and policies of the SNP tae shreds despite having been an independence supporter since the mid 70s. I dont think they do anything for Scotland.
So clever clogs( no offence haarlem), pick my politics out of that lot
Is there something wrong with you? Where have I called you or anyone else a right wing rascist?. DaftyMaybe you should be asking whats happening in the country thats pointing people towards reform rather than just calling them right wing racists.
Again WTF are you on about?Not everybody that supports them are right wing racists, they're just ordinary people frustrated by politicians lack of response to their concerns.
On PMQs in particular she's much more impressive than StarmerWhat is it you like about Kemi Badenoch? Obviously I'm a Labour voter, but I've not seen her as particularly impressive.
All right, take the word racist out of my statement.Is there something wrong with you? Where have I called you or anyone else a right wing rascist?. Dafty
Again WTF are you on about?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.