United spent more I believeA total farce of a game, in a farce of a league.
When you have a club wealthy enough that they can buy any player in the world they want including the best striker in the world at the drop of a hat, competition disappears and you have no league any more.
City paid £51 million for Haaland.
United paid £78.3 million for Harry Maguire.....
All the big clubs have obscene amounts of cash these days - it's all about how you actually spend it.
When you look at some of the money being paid for players Haaland is a bargain.City paid £51 million for Haaland.
United paid £78.3 million for Harry Maguire.....
All the big clubs have obscene amounts of cash these days - it's all about how you actually spend it.
Over here the msm have reported he’s on 400 thousand a week, only De Bryune on more.Haalands wages and fees will be astronomical in comparison.
Not that Maguire will be poorly paid either mind you. But I'd guess a good 3x more per week.
Once the tax changes kick in he'll not have to worry about his leccy bill I expect.Over here the msm have reported he’s on 400 thousand a week, only De Bryune on more.
Pic on Twitter of a guy in a Man U top at the start of the game and he’s in Man City colours in the second half.Some guy standing with a man utd top on in the city end - tinpot rivalry. Wonder if man u tweeted congratulations on haalands 3 hat tricks in a row?
I haven't watched a single piece of EPL action this season.A total farce of a game, in a farce of a league.
When you have a club wealthy enough that they can buy any player in the world they want including the best striker in the world at the drop of a hat, competition disappears and you have no league any more.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.