Burned down again. Tragic - how could it happen again?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm all for preservation of interesting buildings but surely when the cost of doing so is as high as this then the building has to go. There's no way we can plow a couple hundred million into rebuilding one place and not have the knock on result that basic care and maintenance on hundreds of other great buildings is neglected. With human life it is morally hard to make the call on preserving a few lives against the greater good but surely with buildings it's easier to be callus? Where's that new IBM debater to make the choice?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.