- Joined
- Jun 18, 2022
Does it tell them that someone who cries racism holds all the best cards?Who says they're lying? DEI training doesn't tell them to handcuff a dying man.
One person's word changes the situation?
Does it tell them that someone who cries racism holds all the best cards?Who says they're lying? DEI training doesn't tell them to handcuff a dying man.
I don’t put anyone on ignore.Can’t see it. Did he delete it? (Or he’s got me on ignore).
How do you know if you put them on ignore?I don’t put anyone on ignore.
Except Donald fucking Trump and his frog faced nazi poodle.
Alright, they’re not on the Bounce but ye ken whit I mean
I think there's a lot of extrapolation from an awful event. I don't think it demonstrates two teir policing, no matter how much Farage screams about it. The circumstances around this awful case need to be fully investigated and action taken as appropriate. It looks to me like a cop made a catastrophic error. From what @Beagle said I can understand why the cop took the approach he did, but it apoears that he didn't actually look at what was happening when he did so. That's nothing to do with an imagined policy of two teir policing, whatever Farage or Musk may scream.Does it tell them that someone who cries racism holds all the best cards?
One person's word changes the situation?
I found it on the other thread. Good level headed post. The sort of thing that’s needed in this time.I don’t put anyone on ignore.
Except Donald fucking Trump and his frog faced nazi poodle.
Alright, they’re not on the Bounce but ye ken whit I mean
It's on the Two Tier Justice thread.
thanks gentsPosts 68 and 70 on the "Two Tier Remembrance" I think he means.
Can't say I've ever been "kettled at Hampden " or anywhere else and an old woman was seriously injured by a twat on an e bike round here recently but hey its only kids having fun eh ?As I understand it the sequence of events is
1) Brother of the killer calls bizzies to talk about a racist assault
2) Dispatcher tells coppers what's apparently gone on
3) Coppers arrive, guy isn't obviously dying
4) Coppers then completely ignore everything he has to say because they've done what dispatch told them to
5) Tragedy
I don't think the problem is woke policing, I think it's catastrophically incurious policing from rozzers believing the first thing they're told and treating anyone who they mentally put into the 'problem' category as vermin. It's how suspects (particularly brown ones) get the shit kicked out of them when they're already down, it's how 'fenians' like us get kettled at Hampden, it's how teenagers riding around on ebikes get chased down and run over by cop vans. It happens again and again, and people don't get upset when they think the recipients deserve it, but we should be worried about it all the time
Note 'provided it remains within the law'. None of which excuses the coppers in the Henry Nowak case.I was reading the latest output from Paul Embery the now and he mentions this.....
Part 11 of the Equality Act 2010 outlines the Public Sector Equality Duty and provisions for "positive action".
It permits treating certain individuals more favorably to address disadvantage, meet different needs, or increase participation among those with protected characteristics (e.g., race, sex, disability), provided it remains within the law.
![]()
For the race-obsessed British state, the bill is landing
As with the Southport massacre, the murder of Henry Nowak will have ramifications far beyond the immediate eventswww.paulembery.com
And yet the NPCC say......Note 'provided it remains within the law'. None of which excuses the coppers in the Henry Nowak case.
Paul Embury is hardly neutral here. That doesn't make him wrong, but there's a lot of spinning in the article. I would again point to @Beagle excellent summary of policing practice. The drum beat is that the cops did what they did because Henry Nowak was white. An alternative view is that they completely misread the situation with disasterous consequences. No one has actually provided any evidence that the police acted on racial gounds. But boy are the making a lot of noise about it.From the same article. And it appears there IS a two tier approach....
For the police, the road to this new politicised world began with the appalling murder of Stephen Lawrence and the subsequent Macpherson report, which branded the force ‘institutionally racist’, and for which senior officers seem to have spent most of the years since desperately trying to atone.
This has led them to some pretty dark places.
It is, for example, the current position of the National Police Chiefs’ Council, as set out in its ‘race action plan’, that its desired goal of ‘racial equity’ means
‘responding to individuals and communities according to their specific needs’
and that ‘it does not mean treating everyone
“the same” or being “colour blind”’.
So much for equality before the law!
Spun heavily by Embury. I guess the key question is which view do you take: a) this was a grotesque failure by the police on the day, or b) clear evidence of an anti white policing policy?The bits are posted are from links in Emberys article Archie. The equality act link is provided by him.
And the 'current position' link is from the National Police Chief Council.
And both show that policing is not done equally mate.
Dress it up how you want but those are the official positions of the equality act and the NPCC.
Spun heavily? By providing links to official policy?Spun heavily by Embury. I guess the key question is which view do you take: a) this was a grotesque failure by the police on the day, or b) clear evidence of an anti white policing policy?
It's his interpretation, not a statement of fact.Spun heavily? By providing links to official policy?
Aye ok then Archie![]()
So are you saying that the legislation caused Henry Novak's death?
I would say it contributed to it Archie.So are you saying that the legislation caused Henry Novak's death?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.