Jack K
Legendary Radge
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2020
It’s a bit of an irrational bugbear of mine, but it has been since that time.
The Mondays were more authentic than the Roses and maybe this is why they are still the same. The Mondays were straight off the football terraces where the Stone Roses were fashion hos.
For example compare happy mondays photo from 86 and Stone Roses in 85
View attachment 13680
View attachment 13681
Your pictures tell a story, with the Mondays one hinting at the chaos that would destroy them with Shaun Ryder looking a right scrote. Think you may have the year for the photograph wrong as they recorded their debut album in December 1986 and Bez wasn't in the band at that point although he was no doubt attending their gigs. So your photo is from a time when they had a recording contract, had an image and had a style.
The timeline is different for each band with The Mondays a couple of years ahead of The Roses.
Your Roses picture is 4 years before they released their 1st album and 2 years before they started getting a sound and image together. It's so early that the photo contains two guys that are not in the band we know.
So you are comparing a photo of the fully fledged Mondays with a fledgling Roses photo. A band with a recording contract usually has an image and that includes a look, clothing etc whereas a band that doesn't have one is usually still experimenting and trying to work out those things.
Incidentally, Paul Ryder (right of your photo) died at the age of 58 in July 2022, 12 days after his ex wife finished recording a massive podcast about his life and his time in Happy Mondays. It's called The Paul Ryder Tapes and has been on youtube for about 9 months ago. There are about 20 episodes plus bonus episodes.
The main story episodes are a great listen and Paul comes across as talented and a great, if a little fucked up, guy who finally has his shit together. Shaun sounds a nasty, self centred guy but it is Paul telling the story.
Last edited:




) internet genre:

