Interesting piece on the Harvard issue and wider implications.
Plagiarism is not a sin
I think the problem with Claudine Gay is more that;
- manifestly she was not qualified for her position, with an incredibly meagre academic record, riddled with plagiarism and focussed entirely on grievance politics. In short, she was manifestly an appointment based on those politics and not qualification.
- the utter mendacity displayed by her and her fellows from the other Unis. I mean you
can make a case that academic freedom should include allowing people to call for genocide. But when you are simultaneously purging people for stating empirical biological facts, or for the slightest deviance from holy writ, when you are pursuing thought crimes and eliminating diversity of opinion, an appeal to free speech is completely fraudulent.
- In this context these people were revealed as representing the ideology that gave rise to Gay’s appointment, and that ideology has zero interest in free speech, or free academic enquiry; it’s anti enlightenment, totalitarian and anti semitic.
That’s why she had to go.
I think it could be a real watershed moment. I think the business world was largely naive in respect of what was going on in the campuses they were funding. I think they have now woken up big time, as has the general public I suspect. I don’t think the new madrasahs will get such a free ride going forward.