- Joined
- Jan 31, 2008
Well it's started....
On the run up to it I really fancied Murray for it, as I usually do right enough. But he has had a very good year, playing as well and sometimes better than ever.
But tonight.....2 sets down to an unknown, albeit the guy playing superb but Murray way off the boil.
But as he does, Murray is back in it at 2-2.....
Come on saaan.
- - - Updated - - -
Races into a 3-0 lead in 5th set.
- - - Updated - - -
5-1
Murray serving for match
- - - Updated - - -
7-6...6-4
Then wins 6-1...6-3...6-1
Well done saaan.
Needs good rest now
On the run up to it I really fancied Murray for it, as I usually do right enough. But he has had a very good year, playing as well and sometimes better than ever.
But tonight.....2 sets down to an unknown, albeit the guy playing superb but Murray way off the boil.
But as he does, Murray is back in it at 2-2.....
Come on saaan.
- - - Updated - - -
Races into a 3-0 lead in 5th set.
- - - Updated - - -
5-1
Murray serving for match
- - - Updated - - -
7-6...6-4
Then wins 6-1...6-3...6-1
Well done saaan.
Needs good rest now

As for wee brother, of course he is talented. Ridiculous to suggest otherwise. God help us when he is not around. Doomed to another generation of Buster Mottrams and Annabel Crofts. The one player I can accept he is less "talented" than is Federer. I'd argue the one thing Nadal and Djokovic had over him on many occasions has been their remarkable physicality and athleticism. And a dod of mental fortitude. It hasn't be craftsmanship. And there's more rumours about Nadal than there's been about Paula 