Turkey

egb_hibs

Private Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2002
I will fess up and admit I originally thought this was getting more coverage than in warranted, but fair play to the media, it seems like the ostensible cause of the riots is just a trigger for something more important.

As the 'arab spring' comparisons come into play, it poses a quandary. While the security services are (mostly) obeying the government and shoeing the protestors, the protestors are actually on the side of turkish secularism, which only exists because the self same security forces enforce it over the (increasing) majority view.

The protestors, by popular account, are reacting to the encroachments on secularism by the immensely popular moderate islamic governing party. So what side to take for the western liberal democrat?

Personally, for me liberalism (in the non guardian / bbc modern hijack of the term) and secularism (similarly in non dawkins hijacked form) come, in the end, before democracy. So I'm with the rioters. But it's quite a dilemma, and one that would only get more so if, God forbid, it escalates. I hope / believe turkey is too mature a society for it to get that - at least for now.

But if it did, the western world would face some awkward questions in terms of who to back (leaving forms of backing out of it for now).

Any opinions?
 
You're absolutely right, secularism in that country is the most important (and fragile) thing just now. Fully support the rioters and just hope it doesn't turn tragic.
 
feal free to talk about your holiday destinations fellow bouncers as you did on a similar post put up by me about a week ago,hmmmpf!:banger:
 
I honestly thought it would've died down a bit by now . Oh well , I'm off to the Antalya region on Friday if i see any rioting i'll report back :wink: