Jack
Private Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
I'm surprised this hasn't had a mention in the last week. Maybe still celebrating, the European Stuff X2, the Ozzy floods, whatever.
6 months ago, when the old bridge broke we were assured the new bridge was under budget and ON TIME.
I was fortunate enough to be given a tour of the thing about a year ago. I think I explained here that although the accounting was little creative it was still under budget by my way of thinking.
I was also told that the bridge would be finished in December this year. Enough leeway had been built in that weather wasn't really an issue.
During the closure of the current bridge we were ALL assured of the December opening of the new bridge.
We're now told that the weather we had then was the worst we've had in the area for over 90 years. To be honest I can't remember it being that bad. There's been worse winds and storms in my lifetime and there's certainly been worse snow storms in the last few years.
Because of this apparent extreme weather we've had in the last six months the bridge is going to be 6 months late! OK they're saying that was the original date but let's be fair here if you tell someone often enough and for long enough about a revised opening date reverting to an original date isn't acceptable at this late stage
I've got a keen eye for the weather and I've noticed we've not been witnessing any sort of weather apocalypse since December. Do they think we all have our eyes painted on? In fact most days of the 180 or so days since they were on a December 2016 finish have, I'd suggest, been fair to good.
Arithmetic has always been a strong point of mine but I'm struggling to see how a few bad days weather has added 6 months to the completion date.
Do we have any bridge/construction engineering experts on the Bounce who may be able to explain the delay?
6 months ago, when the old bridge broke we were assured the new bridge was under budget and ON TIME.
I was fortunate enough to be given a tour of the thing about a year ago. I think I explained here that although the accounting was little creative it was still under budget by my way of thinking.
I was also told that the bridge would be finished in December this year. Enough leeway had been built in that weather wasn't really an issue.
During the closure of the current bridge we were ALL assured of the December opening of the new bridge.
We're now told that the weather we had then was the worst we've had in the area for over 90 years. To be honest I can't remember it being that bad. There's been worse winds and storms in my lifetime and there's certainly been worse snow storms in the last few years.
Because of this apparent extreme weather we've had in the last six months the bridge is going to be 6 months late! OK they're saying that was the original date but let's be fair here if you tell someone often enough and for long enough about a revised opening date reverting to an original date isn't acceptable at this late stage
I've got a keen eye for the weather and I've noticed we've not been witnessing any sort of weather apocalypse since December. Do they think we all have our eyes painted on? In fact most days of the 180 or so days since they were on a December 2016 finish have, I'd suggest, been fair to good.
Arithmetic has always been a strong point of mine but I'm struggling to see how a few bad days weather has added 6 months to the completion date.
Do we have any bridge/construction engineering experts on the Bounce who may be able to explain the delay?


