Jack
Private Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
http://m.bbc.com/sport/football/32759210
I can see both sides.
I think as the public broadcaster the BBC, I'm my opinion, has a duty to be fair and equitable in the way it does deals with regions. Contrary to what they're saying I think the money raised in Scotland has plenty to do with where it should be spent.
On the other hand the Scottish Football Authorities have a history, even going back to black and white days, of being idiots generally, and in this case specifically in dealing with TV companies.
Ralph doing this now, with a year to go on the contract, seems to me to be lazy pre negotiation tactics. The problem is decades of incompetence.
If my thoughts are correct a population/Barnet type split would see Scotland get around 6.8m, three times the record breaking bookies deal that's just been announced.
I can see both sides.
I think as the public broadcaster the BBC, I'm my opinion, has a duty to be fair and equitable in the way it does deals with regions. Contrary to what they're saying I think the money raised in Scotland has plenty to do with where it should be spent.
On the other hand the Scottish Football Authorities have a history, even going back to black and white days, of being idiots generally, and in this case specifically in dealing with TV companies.
Ralph doing this now, with a year to go on the contract, seems to me to be lazy pre negotiation tactics. The problem is decades of incompetence.
If my thoughts are correct a population/Barnet type split would see Scotland get around 6.8m, three times the record breaking bookies deal that's just been announced.
