R Brand - Cvnt

Forums New posts
Young porty said:
Got to get with it with the current jargon. My son says it constantly. He misses out the f bit as if he doesnt need to say it. I get it.:giggley:
Click to expand...
I just found out recently that the new word for something being barry is peak.

Asked the grandbairn if she was enjoying her tea and she replied "it's peak grandad".
 
I've now been corrected that "big back" means if you eat more than you need to it's "big back activity" 😁😁😁
 
EH17 Jimmy said:
I'm up at my lassies the morn for my tea I'll show the bairns how up to date I am by using that 👍🏻

Oh and the 9 year old revealed last week that calling someone a "big back" means they are fat apparently.
Click to expand...
Big back? WTAF are they teaching these days in anatomy?
 
Caught a bit of commentary on the David Williams thing and I thought it was interesting the central point that he hasn’t been accused of anything criminal - yet - and perhaps the law should be changed to protect children from age gap relationships.

I’m not sure it would have been such a big story if it wasn’t tagged immediately on the end of the Russell Brand one which is very different as he’s been convicted of an extremely vile rape.

I feel the central theme of power corrupting is maybe getting side stepped for revenge. I’m not sure that’s helpful long term, and I suspect the behaviours exist today and will exist tomorrow until exposed. So nothing will really have changed.
 
Purple & Green said:
Caught a bit of commentary on the David Williams thing and I thought it was interesting the central point that he hasn’t been accused of anything criminal - yet - and perhaps the law should be changed to protect children from age gap relationships.

I’m not sure it would have been such a big story if it wasn’t tagged immediately on the end of the Russell Brand one which is very different as he’s been convicted of an extremely vile rape.

I feel the central theme of power corrupting is maybe getting side stepped for revenge. I’m not sure that’s helpful long term, and I suspect the behaviours exist today and will exist tomorrow until exposed. So nothing will really have changed.
Click to expand...
I actually agree with Walliams’ point about the injunction. As you say in your first paragraph, there have been no criminal proceedings (as yet) and what his injunction set out to do - try to prevent trial by media and, as we have seen, trial by social media has now become just that.

The only thing I ever watched him on was Little Britain so, based on his acting of characters in a sketch show, I wasn’t in a position to judge whether he was dodgy or not.

If it transpires that he was on a level with Brand, Savile, Harris and no doubt a few others who might yet be outed, then he deserves all that will come his way.
His career is over no matter how things turn out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Hibs Chat
  • New Posts
  • Just Back
  • Chatroom