I must admit, i`d have preferred we`d kept a hold of him rather than get Dagnall. I felt he offered quite a lot as a striker.

Not sure but it could have been that it wasn't Stubbs's call - if that was the case, that could never have been an option.![]()
You`re maybe right. Utd certainly wanted him back and i think we may have let him go as a bit of goodwill. I was quite impressed with him in the little game time he had here. I would`ve liked to have seen more as he seemed to offer something different from what we had. Pity.
Yeh i thought he had more to offer, and to be honest, Hibs have moved on a lot of good strikers without getting the best out of them. I dont have a prob with who we have, but we need to get more out of each player we sign or get loaned. That said Im UTD glad they got beat by Motherwell as they could prove problematic in play offs
I'm ppretty sure he was eother injured or not match fit when he came to us so perhaos we used him as soon as we could although I agree we should have used him more. DU took him back and we couldn't stop them so not sure what could be done except as Jack said [tongue in cheek] offering £150k for him.
where we not saying at the time that it was up to Hibs to send him back early?
I don't recall that Davy. If it was the case I'll change my mind and say we should have kept a hold of him because even in the short time he played he showed he had something.
EDIT: According to Wiki;
On 1 September 2015, Anier moved on loan to Hibernian, initially for the remainder of the 2015–16 season, however he was recalled to Tannadice in January 2016 after making just three substitute appearances for Hibernian.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.