General Election disaster for working people as Tories stay in power........

GORDONSMITH7

Admin
Private Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
A sober analysis Written by Rob Sewell, Editor of Socialist Appeal . Plenty for egb to froth and rant about however I suspect than many, both Labour and SNP supporters, will agree with at least some of the article.


Today, big business and the fat cats of the City of London are celebrating the victory of their friends in the Tory Party. Champagne bottles are popping and share prices soaring. The party of the rich is back in the saddle, and with an unexpected majority in the House of Commons. This will be a government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich. The super-rich non-doms will be expressing a sigh of relief. Their loot will now be safe under a Tory government.

By contrast, millions of workers have awoken today with a feeling of dread at the news that Cameron and his gang have managed to sneak back to power, albeit with a small majority. The workers of Britain will now face further years of Tory attacks and austerity, as they are forced to pay for the crisis of capitalism. The 12 billion of welfare spending cuts announced by the Tories will fall on the most vulnerable of society: the sick, the old and the infirm. Young people and women in particular will face the full brunt of the Tory austerity juggernaut.

Liberal collapse


This election marks a big change in British politics. For decades there were only three parties that counted in Westminster: the Tories, Labour and the Liberals (now renamed as the Liberal Democrats). But the latter have been shattered. The Lib-Dems have received their just deserts, punished by the electorate for being in bed with the Tories. They are rightly seen as being partners-in-crime in the Coalition, suffering total humiliation and electoral wipe out. They lost 49 MPs, leaving them with only 8 MPs in parliament.

Vince Cable (the Business secretary), Danny Alexander (Treasury secretary), and Ed Davy (Energy minister) all lost their seats for their treachery and opportunism. Their leader, Nick Clegg, just managed to hold on in his Sheffield constituency. But other veteran Lib Dems, like Simon Hughes and Charles Kennedy, were unceremoniously booted out. And despite being re-elected, given the disaster suffered by his party, Clegg was forced to fall on his sword and resign as leader.

Blairites circling as Miliband defeated

Labour leader, Ed Miliband, promised to deliver victory. Instead, Labour, suffered its worst defeat since 1987. Now faced with the prospect of another five years of Tory government, Labour supporters will be clutching their heads, wondering what went wrong. The party managed to gain 23 less seats than under Gordon Brown in 2010. Symbolically, Ed Balls, Labours shadow chancellor and the architect of Labours austerity lite programme, lost his seat to a Tory. In Scotland, Jim Murphy, the newly-elected right-wing leader, was defeated, as was Labour campaign manager, Douglas Alexander.

Such was the scale of disappointment that Ed Miliband resigned as Labour leader, opening the way for a new leadership contest. Given the new rigged electoral rules, there will be no Left candidate. Already the representatives from a new breed of eager young Blairite careerists, each one more repellent than other, are falling over themselves in their haste to grab the job.

It seems incredible that after five years of painful austerity, Labour failed miserably to defeat the Tories. The responsibility for this lies exclusively with the partys right-wing leadership, which has failed to fight the Tories seriously and presents a programme that offered the electorate no clear alternative to Camerons austerity. It is true that in the course of the election, Miliband made a vague attempt to distance himself from the Tories and Liberals, but it was a case of too little and much too late.

The leaderships reliance on a clever over-paid American adviser proved disastrous. After five years of me-too policies, people regarded Labours promises with scepticism. And who can blame them? On the first page of the Labour manifesto the need for further austerity was featured prominently. A programme based on more cuts was not going to inspire people to vote Labour. That is very clear from the results.

Outflanked by the SNP


As one could expect, the Blairites and Tory press are blaming the defeat on the party being too left wing and anti-business. But this flies in the face of the real mood, as shown in Scotland where the SNP successfully attacked Labour from the left.

The appeal of the Scottish National Party was that it stood on a programme of anti-austerity, the cancelling of Trident and other radical policies. They played the anti-Tory card and offered to back a Labour government if it was committed to combat austerity an offer that was foolishly rejected by Ed Miliband. As a consequence, the SNP went from 6 MPs to 56, the equivalent of a political tsunami in Scotland, with an unprecedented 50% of the vote. The three other Westminster parties were reduced to rock bottom, with only one MP each.

In what was possibly the biggest electoral swing recorded in history, Labour lost 40 MPs to the SNP in one fell swoop, including Gordon Browns old constituency. The SNP recorded swings of 39% from Labour in Glasgow North-East. Similar swings took place throughout Scotland.

This seismic transformation exposes the lie that people are alienated by left-wing policies. The Labour Party once had a solid base in Scotland, but for years it drifted to the right, abandoned socialist policies, and let people down.

Many former Labour voters explained that they had not abandoned Labour, but Labour had abandoned them. There were many references to Tony Blair and the Iraq war. The fact that Labour had sided with the Tories and Lib Dems in the Independence referendum campaign was also a big factor in the partys electoral collapse. All the Westminster parties, including Labour, had been tainted. They were seen as part of the rotten British Establishment.

Goodbye, Nigel

There were some bright spots for Labour, for instance in London, where the party did well. Again, this was repeated in Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, in fact all the industrial conurbations.

Even UKIP, which put itself forward as an anti-establishment party, has eaten into potential Labour support, especially in the north of England. Labour had gained some Tory seats, but had also lost seats to the Tories.

However, the much-heralded UKIP breakthrough failed to materialise. It managed to retain one MP, who had previously defected from the Tories in Kent, but lose another. Also the UKIP leader Farage failed to win a seat. Given this upset, he also tendered his resignation. But UKIP without Farage is nothing, especially as the Tories have stolen their clothes by promising to grant an in/out referendum on Europe.

The Green Party, which fought on an anti-austerity programme, increased their share of their vote. Around a million people voted Green, including a significant layer of radicalised youth. Caroline Lucas, the single Green MP for Brighton Pavilion, increased her majority. But elsewhere, thanks to an electoral system biased against smaller parties, the Greens failed to win a seat.

Leaving the EU; breaking up the UK

Cameron has managed to squeak into No 10 - the first time the party has won a majority since 1992. However, with a small majority, this will not be a stable government. The issue of the promised referendum over Europe by 2017 will open up serious divisions within their ranks. We saw what trouble the Tories got themselves into under John Major, who referred to his backbenchers as bastards. The decisive section of the British capitalist class does not want Britain to leave the EU. But it is possible that they could lose a referendum on Europe, with disastrous consequences.

Similarly, if there were to be a second referendum on Scottish Independence, it is quite likely that the majority could vote Yes. It is obvious that the SNP will sweep the board in the elections to Holyrood in 2016. With his opportunist promotion of English nationalism for party political reasons, Cameron has been playing with fire. A Tory government that carries out deep cuts will to push the Scottish people further towards Independence and the break-up of the United Kingdom.

The new Tory government will be unstable and prone to all kinds of splits and crises. While there was no mass movement against the previous Coalition, due to the failure of the Labour and Trade union leaders, there is colossal anger building up in the working class, which can explode during the next parliament. As the Tories intensify the austerity, they can very quickly face mass opposition on the streets. The trade union leaders will not be able hold back this anger indefinitely. Despite themselves, they will be pushed firstly into semi-opposition and then all-out opposition.

Turbulence, crisis, and struggle ahead


The situation in Britain has never been so volatile. The underlying mood of discontent will intensify. The problem is that, politically, it has as yet found no direct expression, except in Scotland. This majority Tory government in reality is resting on only 35% of those who voted (and 24% of the entire electorate), which is far from solid. When its true character stands exposed, it will soon lose its legitimacy in the eyes of millions. The promises made about a new prosperity will be shown to be a pack of lies. The attempt to balance the books, as the economy slows down, will pile on the misery for working people.

As the crisis in Europe spreads, further austerity will be demanded. The aim of reducing public spending to pre-war levels will mean a return to Victorian conditions for many and create a mood of anger and massive opposition towards the Tory government. They carried out only 40% of cuts in the last parliament, with 60% now to follow.

As the Tories tighten the screws, the rich will get richer and the poor ever poorer.The policies of patching up capitalism, put forward by the Labour leaders, have proved to be a complete failure. Rather than ape the Tories, the Labour movement needs to fight on a programme to change society. There is no way out for working people on the basis of capitalism - only increased austerity and misery. Only the reorganisation of society on socialist lines can offer a way out of this nightmare.

Only by taking over the commanding heights of the economy - the banks, insurance companies and major monopolies - can we democratically plan the economy in the interests of working people. On this basis, we can provide well-paid jobs, decent housing and free education for our children. The resources would be there to massively raise living standards and eliminate capitalist austerity. British people are crying out for a radical programme. If such a programme was put forward it would win a landslide everywhere.
 
The greater disaster is labour abandoning people in favour of middle class obsessions and political correctness, well that and bursting the economy. The scots and English working class are moving to snp and UKIP respectively, which has cost labour power. If that forces them to reconsider their direction then in the bigger picture this result is a good thing.

- - - Updated - - -

That article is a hoot - UKIP who cost labour power and took millions of working class votes 'failed to break through' where the greens, party of upper class bohemians, did well with 'radicalised youth' - ie middle class students. Get outta here - this writer, no doubt a posho, is another bag carrier for the man, with zero in here about useful alternatives and only pie and the sky offered to distract people from the possibility of real change.
 
The greater disaster is labour abandoning people in favour of middle class obsessions and political correctness, well that and bursting the economy. The scots and English working class are moving to snp and UKIP respectively, which has cost labour power. If that forces them to reconsider their direction then in the bigger picture this result is a good thing.

- - - Updated - - -

That article is a hoot - UKIP who cost labour power and took millions of working class votes 'failed to break through' where the greens, party of upper class bohemians, did well with 'radicalised youth' - ie middle class students. Get outta here - this writer, no doubt a posho, is another bag carrier for the man, with zero in here about useful alternatives and only pie and the sky offered to distract people from the possibility of real change.

So UKIP got 3 million votes and and millions of them were working class, none were middle class, none were ex Liberal voters whose vote collapsed or right wing anti EU Tories who think that the Tories are soft.....your psephology prowess will have Professor Curtis looking over his shoulder.

Labour cost Labour power. However Farage jacking and UKIP flopping even in the Shires of England was splendid.

It does appear that UKIP's right wing Neanderthal leadership were shitting themselves of a Labour/SNP/Plaid Cymru/Greens 'Hard left rabble' governance though......


http://www.nottinghampost.com/Nottingham-South-UKIP-candidate-thinks-votes/story-26462712-detail/story.html

Sorry bud didnae work.......

Labour 20697

Tory 13671

UKIP 4900

This glorified bouncer says it as most of the tops of UKIP saw it....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11587745/Major-Ukip-donor-urges-partys-supporters-to-vote-Conservative-in-unwinnable-seats.html

Oh by the way Rob is a working class Welshman. Sorry that blokes like Rob and my good self do not fit in with your right wing agenda of rather tired Daily Mail inspired characterisation of people.

BIG G
 
[MENTION=29]GORDONSMITH7[/MENTION]

You'll really need to provide a synopsis of these lengthy quotes, particularly on a Saturday night!

I've read a few, sober, and some are good stuff, but in my opinion you need to provide a hook that might encourage more to get into and appreciate the nitty gritty of the full message.
 
[MENTION=29]GORDONSMITH7[/MENTION]

You'll really need to provide a synopsis of these lengthy quotes, particularly on a Saturday night!

I've read a few, sober, and some are good stuff, but in my opinion you need to provide a hook that might encourage more to get into and appreciate the nitty gritty of the full message.

Quite honestly a saddos such as I, loitering with intent on a fans website on a Saturday night should be hooked.:rollfloor Still off the bevvy after 4 months is my excuse amigo. Have ye seen WFM about that Hot Chocolate record yet?

BIG G
 
So UKIP got 3 million votes and and millions of them were working class, none were middle class, none were ex Liberal voters whose vote collapsed or right wing anti EU Tories who think that the Tories are soft.....your psephology prowess will have Professor Curtis looking over his shoulder.

Labour cost Labour power. However Farage jacking and UKIP flopping even in the Shires of England was splendid.

It does appear that UKIP's right wing Neanderthal leadership were $#@!ting themselves of a Labour/SNP/Plaid Cymru/Greens 'Hard left rabble' governance though......


http://www.nottinghampost.com/Nottingham-South-UKIP-candidate-thinks-votes/story-26462712-detail/story.html

Sorry bud didnae work.......

Labour 20697

Tory 13671

UKIP 4900

This glorified bouncer says it as most of the tops of UKIP saw it....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11587745/Major-Ukip-donor-urges-partys-supporters-to-vote-Conservative-in-unwinnable-seats.html

Oh by the way Rob is a working class Welshman. Sorry that blokes like Rob and my good self do not fit in with your right wing agenda of rather tired Daily Mail inspired characterisation of people.

BIG G

G you now and again make the - to my mind admirable - point about the plight of english workers in the event of independence. So I find it confusing that this appears accompanied by a lack of empathy or perhaps just lack of curiosity as to the nature of their plight. Let's wait and see, but I suspect analysis will reflect my initial quick look at labour target seats (see did UKIP cost labour thread) that flight to UKIP will have cost labour dearly, on top of the estimated 6 million working class votes they've lost since 97 (or perhaps it's those votes reappearing elsewhere).

The high minded sorts in labour seem to me to,prefer to encourage the proles to stew in the juices of events 30 years ago while ignoring their concerns of today. Do you really want to do that also?

Perhaps I will turn out to be wrong about the analysis. If not I would welcome your opinion in due course, as to what if anything should be the labour response.

- - - Updated - - -

Ps G, UKIP took nearer 4m votes or put another way 42% of the amount labour did. If you don't think that warrants consideration I am sure the Labour Party will.