Two Headed Boy
Private Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
- Messages
- 5,113
- Reaction score
- 6,395
- Points
- 129
Seen the above doing the rounds on Facebook. Anyone any idea if it is genuine or not?
Seen the above doing the rounds on Facebook. Anyone any idea if it is genuine or not?
I've asked him, in the spirit of transparency, if he could let folk know what team he supports. I expect to either be ignored or for him to claim to not follow a team.
Either way, it's deeply suspect behaviour.A man without a team cannot be trusted.
I've asked him, in the spirit of transparency, if he could let folk know what team he supports. I expect to either be ignored or for him to claim to not follow a team.
Either way, it's deeply suspect behaviour.A man without a team cannot be trusted.
I've asked him why he hasnt tweeted the response from Hibs yet. I see a post form Perthibby but not sure what medium that is from as it doesn't appear on his twitter feed.
I've asked him why he hasnt tweeted the response from Hibs yet. I see a post form Perthibby but not sure what medium that is from as it doesn't appear on his twitter feed.
Off his facebook pageYeah was kinda wondering that myself. Where did you get that response from [MENTION=13706]Perthhibee[/MENTION]?
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah was kinda wondering that myself. Where did you get that response from [MENTION=13706]Perthhibee[/MENTION]?
Because he's a Councillor for Edinburgh Council.
His data allowance on his mobile phone contract has probably went over-budget so the apology Tweet will be delayed and due to budget issues will probably not be the full apology has previously promised.
:glassraise:
I dont get the last line.... why would we have to re examin the issue accreditation?
we pay it and that should be the end of it....
He cannae delete LDs tweetHe deleted the muckle facebook thread that started this whole sorry episode. Never found out what team he supports....
The press will be all over this too thanks to the fan sites. He can try to cover it up in the hope it will go away but he's chosen the wrong target for his self-promotion vehicle. The brand loyalty of Hibs fans to their club is way stronger than anyone's brand loyalty to a political party or politician.
I dont get the last line.... why would we have to re examin the issue accreditation?
we pay it and that should be the end of it....
He tweeted he wasn't a jambo....
Aye, you'd think so. This accreditation will be another made up form-filling nonsense, like yon investors in people pish from a few years ago. It'll get you a nice wall plaque and an entry on some database where prospective employees can check before agreeing to work for your organisation.
Those involved and promoting these initiatives get their heads in a spin if everyone isn't on board with their projects.
He tweeted he wasn't a jambo....
Hibs did it [paid the living wage] without triumphalising it. He should have done his homework before starting a petition. The guy is a self publicising welt in that he thought he was going to draw something to everyones attention that didn't acually exist [Hibs not paying the living wage].
In short, he is a welt and he's been told he is.
I'm in agreement totally. I was just mentioning what I thought the championing of this accreditation was. Given that the Gunts recently made a song and dance about their own involvement with living wage, I expected this choob to have been one of their own (in spite of his denial) as it's a very 'Hearts' thing to do - to try and have a snide dig at Hibs after them so publicly singing from the rooftops about the same thing.
The reason why Hibs won't be accredited is because reading Dempsters reply we wouldn't be a living wage employer. It's not about just contracted staff, it's about all staff including casual catering staff etc. who I know are not on the living wage...
Accreditation costs buttons. And it's not an onerous obligation in terms of the time you have to commit to it.
The reason why Hibs won't be accredited is because reading Dempsters reply we wouldn't be a living wage employer. It's not about just contracted staff, it's about all staff including casual catering staff etc. who I know are not on the living wage...
Accreditation costs buttons. And it's not an onerous obligation in terms of the time you have to commit to it.
Nice to see you Al. The catering staff seem to me to be overwhelmingly kids in a Saturday job. Are they covered by min wage? I'm not persuaded they should be - but that's cowshed stuff - but I don't know if they are or not? For the avoidance of doubt, the adult staff ought to be on it in my view; they seem to be few and in the supervisory roles.
Nice to see you Al. The catering staff seem to me to be overwhelmingly kids in a Saturday job. Are they covered by min wage? .
Nice to see you back amigo.
[video=youtube;SGZqDzb__bw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGZqDzb__bw[/video]
We discussed this at the St. Pat's Branch meeting on Thursday night (not about the 12 year auld SNP gadgie cooncillor, which we were not aware of ) during a meeting with Amit. Committee member Tam Mc pressed for answers to all these points and Amit said he would take them back to the Board. No petition required.
GGTTH
BIG G
PS I think there is more chance of progressive changes at ER through Supporters groups engaging with Hibs than politicians of whatever ilk.
I know for a fact the catering staff as of last year at the PBS were not on the living wage
Min wage for U18 is under £4 an hour
National Minimum Wage rates - GOV.UK
Good employers pay them more than that though. (I'm sure my laddies got a £5 an hour IIRC at U18)
Statistically most U18s are now expected to be in full time education or training and so it generally does mean if they are working it is in a "Saturday job" or similar. As you say, that's a Cowshed debate.
PS I am sure the catering is an outside contractor and not Hibs directly - so who is the employer?
Nice to see you Al. The catering staff seem to me to be overwhelmingly kids in a Saturday job. Are they covered by min wage? I'm not persuaded they should be - but that's cowshed stuff - but I don't know if they are or not? For the avoidance of doubt, the adult staff ought to be on it in my view; they seem to be few and in the supervisory roles.
This thread has been viewed 4222 times.