- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 15,011
- Reaction score
- 8,109
- Points
- 129
Fuckall tae dae with how we played but the ref booked Nisbet for high feet and ignored 2 RC players for same thing, one, Randall, was booked later on and would have walked.
The 2 footed challenge from the county player no different from porteous sending off ,then hanlon nearly has his top pulled of and a foul goes the other way instead of a penalty, yes it wasn't a pretty spectacle but once again hibs lose a really soft goal and the heads hit the deck
That's a straight red! Happened just before halftime. Awful tackle and you can guarantee if that was a Hibs player it would have been red.
agree
I disagree, I don’t think it’s red, neither was Porteous’s.That's a straight red! Happened just before halftime. Awful tackle and you can guarantee if that was a Hibs player it would have been red.
Agreed. And although he was a poor referee a red we can't really argue with. The manager focussing the blame onto the ref also pretty poor.
That is worse then portos… fuvkin disgrace, where’s the media outcry.. hopefully Ross mentions this in the media
agree
agree
The way Jack Ross spoke last night it sounded like there was agreement between Boyle and the ref on the actual words that were used but the ref took them to be directed at him personally whereas Boyle claims it was a comment about his performance.If we appeal Boyles red card it rests on exactly what was said. The ref has two witnesses, the linesmen and Boyle has one, Hanlon. We cannot possibly win that appeal.
The way Jack Ross spoke last night it sounded like there was agreement between Boyle and the ref on the actual words that were used but the ref took them to be directed at him personally whereas Boyle claims it was a comment about his performance.
I'm struggling to guess what that might mean but I suppose something like "what chance have we got with a homer ref" could do it.
I was assuming it was something that could be interpreted as accusing the ref of taking a bribe.Or maybe "You refereed that game like a c*nt"
My argument being that Porteus' tackle shouldn't be red and therfore it follows neither that one last night.The 2 footed challenge from the county player no different from porteous sending off ,then hanlon nearly has his top pulled of and a foul goes the other way instead of a penalty, yes it wasn't a pretty spectacle but once again hibs lose a really soft goal and the heads hit the deck
Unless Paul and Daz put a version tgetherIf we appeal Boyles red card it rests on exactly what was said. The ref has two witnesses, the linesmen and Boyle has one, Hanlon. We cannot possibly win that appeal.
If Hibs appealed Portos and lost then surely that tackle will get a retrospective red card. It’s only logical
agree
He did thoughOr maybe "You refereed that game like a c*nt"
This thread has been viewed 2439 times.