David Starkey and Gorgeous George on the same panel...already fallen out big time over what constitutes rape.:Embarassed:
George looks ill.
What a fascistic boor he is. He didn't like it up im from the crazed squirrel that is starkey.
I'm honestly not sure if you're referring to george or starkers there!Still peddling the pish about private/public school $#@!e, designed to confuse the 200 a week welder, I see.
David Starkey and Gorgeous George on the same panel...already fallen out big time over what constitutes rape.:Embarassed:

I got a bite off George on Twitter a few weeks back! He was giving Kashmiri independence big licks, so I asked why not the same for Scotland? **** called me a clown and said, "Don't compare yourself to Kashmiris" I told him I wasn't and asked why he wants independence for many nations but not Scotland? It was a rhetorical question! :rodpetrie:

I found it highly entertaining
Have some well earned rep :yas:

Starkey is a fine example of the arrogance and rudeness which the middle classes give us .A slap in the puss is required for that wee prick.
GG was not at his best , but is still the best orator out there for me.
"How very dare they little tube working people strike to save jobs" had me swearing at the tv and had mrs Tayside giving me one of her looks.
I fookin hate the silver spoon middle class spivs who look down on us minions and want to keep us there at all costs. At least GG puts them to task, very few do.
"How dare they tube people strike in response to an oversubscribed voluntary redundancy programme" not have sufficient revolutionary ring to it?
what a Fukin clown that is. A very dangerous oneWell from what I heard tonight the tube passengers
May end up better catered for , while the only problem the workforce experiences is that not all so want redundancy can get it.
It's not exactly the Paris commune.
I take it you are not one to grumble about taxpayers money being spent on London btw
, as long as income tax dosent go up.
What a crock of $#@! Question Time is becoming. I used to enjoy the programme tbh, now am lucky if I last 10-15 minutes most weeks.
I tune in, more in hope than anything...I can't quite fathom why but I prefer the ramblings on TW afterwards from Abbot, Portillo, Johnson and Co than most weeks on QT because the discussion is more cordial and mature, regardless of stance.
The one week I began to wonder was the week they had Katie Hopkins on. That was frightening. She had gone on with one intention - to bait Diane Abbot into giving her a newspaper headline the following day. It didn't happen though, the wily old MP saw it coming and didn't oblige.
I forgave them, almost, the week after when they made reference to their drop in standards by inviting KH on to the programme the week before...

What be this mate?
Gotta say, I deliberately missed the KH yin, didnae trust maself to no throw something at ma tele!![]()
This week. It is, in theory, the perfect storm with Portillo and Abbot the usual guests and Andrew Neil hosting (he is a bit of a parody of himself) but it is generally more interesting than QT. As you would expect MP and DA are at different ends of the spectrum but they discuss things with maturity and bon homie missing from the circus that is QT.
If somebody had said to me I'd watch any programme with that three on it I'd have laughed them out of town a few years back but it's now arguably my secret vice.![]()
(I still remember staying up all night to see MP lose his seat in days of yore...but he's mellowed with age)
This week. It is, in theory, the perfect storm with Portillo and Abbot the usual guests and Andrew Neil hosting (he is a bit of a parody of himself) but it is generally more interesting than QT. As you would expect MP and DA are at different ends of the spectrum but they discuss things with maturity and bon homie missing from the circus that is QT.
If somebody had said to me I'd watch any programme with that three on it I'd have laughed them out of town a few years back but it's now arguably my secret vice.![]()
(I still remember staying up all night to see MP lose his seat in days of yore...but he's mellowed with age)
I've not missed an episode since it launched way back in 2002? To think way back then I *hated* Portillo. I like him now a lot. Away from party politics some politicians are decent sorts...
As usual I can't quite grasp exactly what your banging on about , but admittedly that's down to my poor interpretation I'm sure.There's no illegal wars in London but Nats are often given to complaining about money spent on the place. As for insinuating I'm a Tory - a consistent theme of mine is the big picture where wages and ts and cs are depressed by mass immigration. The left cheer lead for this while getting in a lather over issues like an over subscribed voluntary redundancy scheme.
I have to say I don't know what the feck these political categories are meant to mean anymore. Add these things together and the left is facilitating global capitalism,
Acting against labour interests,
And looking to milk workers taxes as an end in itself.
If that observation makes me a
Tory then I don't know what it makes those I'm carping about
That was pretty manky to watch. Galloway is hardly one to pontificate having described shagging someone while they are asleep as merely "poor sexual etiquette" in his defence of Assange. I used to have time for Galloway, but his cynical, and laughable attempt to wade into the indy debate by trying to exploit sectarianism has lost me the little remaining respect i had for the guy.
Wings Over Scotland | We were going to be angry
WEEKLY $#@! #008: GEORGE GALLOWAY | A Thousand Flowers
- - - Updated - - -
Neil and Portillo's faces give me the boak somewhat but I agree its actually not a bad show. Portillo and Abbot sit too close together though.
Because it is on so late I have it on Sky+ so that on the nights I really can't keep my eyes open, I can catch up with it over the weekend.
I had a slow burning change of heart about MP over a long period of time. He has changed as a political animal and in terms of no longer being the overly ambitious politico. He is now like the elder statesman giving well thought out opinion - some of which I concur with and some of which I don't but I don't think he would be someone to look down on you for not agreeing with him, so long as you knew why you thought what you did and could make a reasoned case. You can see the dynamic between him and DA works because both respect each other even when they are polar opposites. I think he would be very interesting company at the dinner party table.
I think there's more to it. Politicians can't be honest while in office - sounds like a cliche but I mean in ways other than the usual. They really cannot be honest about reality as people won't stand for it. There's also all the image stuff - Galloway exploits this mercilessly - he got bullied by a crazed old queen last nigh because for once he was up against someone who is not constrained in what they can say back to him as normal politicians are
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.