Jack
Private Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
"desrcibed as: “Mild language, generally of little concern. However, seen as less acceptable by those familiar with the history and use of the term as a sectarian insult.”
From an Ofcom report which looked into various words that could cause offence. Money must be tight at Ofcom. Only 248 people were used in the survey!
I agree completely, said Jack (a Jock also mild language, generally of little concern, which we knew only too well ;-) #249. Mild to the point of being a term of endearment for the sevcovians and their opinion is generally of little concern.
Read more at: ‘Hun’ and ‘Jock’ not offensive, says Ofcom research - The Scotsman
- - - Updated - - -
Funny thing is that most of the comments are about Jock. The term hun and sevco are both banned by the arsewipe Scotsman so any attempt to comment in that respect gets binned!
From an Ofcom report which looked into various words that could cause offence. Money must be tight at Ofcom. Only 248 people were used in the survey!
I agree completely, said Jack (a Jock also mild language, generally of little concern, which we knew only too well ;-) #249. Mild to the point of being a term of endearment for the sevcovians and their opinion is generally of little concern.
Read more at: ‘Hun’ and ‘Jock’ not offensive, says Ofcom research - The Scotsman
- - - Updated - - -
Funny thing is that most of the comments are about Jock. The term hun and sevco are both banned by the arsewipe Scotsman so any attempt to comment in that respect gets binned!
