The committee suggested a change in the disciplinary rules when dealing with a disciplinary involving a committee member.The specific issue in hand is the way in which an assault by a club and committee member has been dealt with. A precedent has been set that an assault is only worth a very short ban from the club. I am certain non-committee members would face more severe punishment - and rightly so. You’d equally face greater punishment by the law. That’s my understanding of the EGM being called to enable a review of the club’s disciplinary policy. The outcome from the EGM appears to be that the committee are happy with said policy - is that correct (I couldn’t make EGM, so genuine question)?
These changes were presented to the branch delegates 2 months ago.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk