He was a part of it. Just cause we disagreed doesn't mean he wasn't. If he wasn't he wouldn't have put whoever forward.
Just because the word ignored was used, doesn't mean we deafied him, just didn't go with his recommendation.
His whole deal is to give us money and get us players? What you on about?
Think he's been a bit of a cock saying anything publicly, and the other article from his insider is a cock too.
There's no need for it. He doesn't get to rule with an iron fist and because he's no got his way he's throwing a strop?
Imagine speaking out after 1 result.
Imagine one of your shareholders and board members people coming out and saying they don't want your manager and sporting director in those positions.
Less than 1 league game into their tenure.
There's a relationship to be had, but it's not to be dictated on his terms. It's not his club. He wouldn't let a 25% shareholder in Bournemouth do that to him.