For most of the game we played with one striker though. Gauld did hee-haw. I'm wondering if we should have kept Hyndman after all and given him a second chance. The flashes we saw of him have impressed more than what I've seen of Gauld.Last nights team wasn’t negative. Two strikers and gauld in behind. Players played crap in seconds half. Work rate and desire wasnt there
I’d say very if not identical set up when we beat them at ER. Mallan sat instead of Milligan.Big difference Is we didnt press their defence.When I said team selection was negative I was meaning six defenders and goalie. Also the same players were selected as Lennon would.No imagination at all.We had nothing to lose but they did not want to change anything.Garbage.You can dress it up how you want.
Hence l said we didn’t press. Hence I said gauld played. Hence structure to the team was same and real change was Milligan for Mallan.We were missing Horgan too. Horgan and Mallan bossed them at ER. Our midfield was meek last night
What are you on about?Hence l said we didn’t press. Hence I said gauld played. Hence structure to the team was same and real change was Milligan for Mallan.
I will take a mental note to check everything 100% . FFS didn’t know it was an English exam.
FAO admin please disable by log in. Social media has finally got on my Bristol’s cities .