SlovSam
Private Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 5,792
- Reaction score
- 2,433
- Points
- 135
Since we arent really testing the only real stat is deaths. Theres 4 people self isolating from my team at work. All phoned 111 but none offered a test. Imagine theres lots in the same boat.
Just asking, is there a difference between the first and third graphs? They look different, but illustrate the same stats?
I dont think the numbers are (that) relevant, as China has a population 20x Italy - it's to do with the curve. The log thing throws me because it's that long since I done it.
Yes agreed. Definitely its the curve that matters and frankly the only bottom line figure that I can interpret is the number of deaths as I don't really get or understand all the sources though the FT guy John Burn Murdoch on Twitter is a good follow.
10 deaths at the moment seems fairly low I think which must be a tribute to NHS Scotland who are at the front line
There were 800 suicides in Scotland sadly last year which is tragic but might give a comparison in the future.
Yes agreed. Definitely its the curve that matters and frankly the only bottom line figure that I can interpret is the number of deaths as I don't really get or understand all the sources though the FT guy John Burn Murdoch on Twitter is a good follow.
10 deaths at the moment seems fairly low I think which must be a tribute to NHS Scotland who are at the front line
There were 800 suicides in Scotland sadly last year which is tragic but might give a comparison in the future.
Yes agreed. Definitely its the curve that matters and frankly the only bottom line figure that I can interpret is the number of deaths as I don't really get or understand all the sources though the FT guy John Burn Murdoch on Twitter is a good follow.
10 deaths at the moment seems fairly low I think which must be a tribute to NHS Scotland who are at the front line
There were 800 suicides in Scotland sadly last year which is tragic but might give a comparison in the future.
Scotland does surveillance testing. Basically from testing in a bunch of representative areas they can quite accurately work out how many across Scotland have anything. They've been doing it for years.
Prof Jason Leitch described it on the radio as being similar to the way radio and TV stations work out viewing figures.
![]()
Scottish surveillance testing system for Covid-19 begins
The plan will detect community transmission of the coronavirus in the event of an outbreak in Scotland.www.bbc.co.uk
View media item 226
This one looks very positive.
Forgive me if I can't interpret them but as Scottish Health service is devolved I hope its helpful to see the developing picture in Scotland as so often our situation just gets immersed in the English numbers.
I think its the shape of the curve that matters rather than the actual numbers as large populated countries will obviously be at the top.
Interestingly, I see quarantine is not a devolved matter.That sounds very positive and it would be interesting how that compares to other countries.
Interesting to know if it was published. Probably not.
I think its a fair criticism of the Scottish government that they don't explain that public health and the Scottish NHS is a devolved matter and that there may be good reasons why they don't need to follow exactly what is happening in England.
As data develops, policy evolves as there must be explanations why death rates vary so wildly between countries (look at Germanys amazing low death rate v Italys tragically high) though some of it will be different ways of measuring these sad statistics.
This thread has been viewed 137682 times.