Can you see it yet?

[misshibsteria]

I wanted to post this in the thread that covered a man pretending to be a woman calling rape victims bigots and telling them it's okay if they orgasm while being raped but I can't find it.

Here's some men , Benjamin Cohen from Pink News, knowing what a woman is when he wants to rent a womb.

 

[egb_hibs]

There's an interesting point here about one departure from reality leading to another. The language used around these types of procedures frequently includes talk of gay couples making or having a baby. Of course they are not- they are making a baby in collaboration with a member of the opposite sex with medical assistance.

The point I am making here is not about them doing it it's about how its described which slips into how its thought of. The need we as a society seem to have to go beyond enabling things but talking as if they are no different than other things, I think reaches its latest heights in the trans claims. But I dont think that emerged in a vacuum its part of a bigger blurring of reality and wish fulfilment.

 

[misshibsteria]

There's an interesting point here about one departure from reality leading to another. The language used around these types of procedures frequently includes talk of gay couples making or having a baby. Of course they are not- they are making a baby in collaboration with a member of the opposite sex with medical assistance.

The point I am making here is not about them doing it it's about how its described which slips into how its thought of. The need we as a society seem to have to go beyond enabling things but talking as if they are no different than other things, I think reaches its latest heights in the trans claims. But I dont think that emerged in a vacuum its part of a bigger blurring of reality and wish fulfilment.

My point is that people who pretend that sex is isn't real know that it's real when it suits them.

 

[misshibsteria]

There's an interesting point here about one departure from reality leading to another. The language used around these types of procedures frequently includes talk of gay couples making or having a baby. Of course they are not- they are making a baby in collaboration with a member of the opposite sex with medical assistance.

The point I am making here is not about them doing it it's about how its described which slips into how its thought of. The need we as a society seem to have to go beyond enabling LL things but talking as if they are no different than other things, I think reaches its latest heights in the trans claims. But I dont think that emerged in a vacuum its part of a bigger blurring of reality and wish fulfilment.

Commissioning parents is the legal term. They are buying a baby. We could start another thread on that and whether women's bodies are a workplace.

As I said tho, my point was that even some of the most hardcore gender ideologists know what sex means when it suits them.

 

[egb_hibs]

When I was a teenager, I remember one sauced up afternoon (yet I can barely remember yesterday) my mates and I having to try hard not to rip the pish out of a friend who expressed concern about what he’d been reading about cervical cancer, and the risk it might pose to us. Once the guffawing had been choked off a basic biology course was launched to the best of our impeded faculties.

I do now wonder if we were complacent in our assumptions to the point of irresponsibility, given what science has since discovered.

Access Restricted

 

[aggie]

When I was a teenager, I remember one sauced up afternoon (yet I can barely remember yesterday) my mates and I having to try hard not to rip the pish out of a friend who expressed concern about what he’d been reading about cervical cancer, and the risk it might pose to us. Once the guffawing had been choked off a basic biology course was launched to the best of our impeded faculties.

I do now wonder if we were complacent in our assumptions to the point of irresponsibility, given what science has since discovered.

Access Restricted

Behind a paywall — can you summarise?

 

[greencol]

Commissioning parents is the legal term. They are buying a baby. We could start another thread on that and whether women's bodies are a workplace.

As I said tho, my point was that even some of the most hardcore gender ideologists know what sex means when it suits them.

I've commissioned a few boilers in my time.......

 

[Bangkokhibby]

I've commissioned a few boilers in my time.....

Fantastic. The old double entendre.

 

[greencol]

Fantastic. The old double entendre.

Jamie is still at it!

 

[egb_hibs]

Behind a paywall — can you summarise?

The headline tells most of it Aggie. Some outpost of the cult wittering on in the mode of the day;

'Ovarian Cancer Action posted on Twitter: “Did you know that anyone with ovaries, regardless of gender identity, can be at risk for ovarian cancer?

“Let’s raise awareness by asking: can men get ovarian cancer? #PrideMonth #OvarianCancerAwareness”

The post was accompanied by an emoji of a rainbow flag, as well as an image entitled: ‘Can men get ovarian cancer?’ along with the answer: “Anyone with ovaries, regardless of gender identity, can be at risk of ovarian cancer.

“Additionally all genders can carry a BRCA gene fault or Lynch syndrome - which would potentially mean their children would be at a higher risk of ovarian cancer.”'

You long for the light bulb moment where it is realised that 'woman' is not a malleable abstract concept but a synonym for 'anyone with ovaries' and a 101 other defining attributes that exist in objective reality.

 

[aggie]

The headline tells most of it Aggie. Some outpost of the cult wittering on in the mode of the day;

'Ovarian Cancer Action posted on Twitter: “Did you know that anyone with ovaries, regardless of gender identity, can be at risk for ovarian cancer?

“Let’s raise awareness by asking: can men get ovarian cancer? #PrideMonth #OvarianCancerAwareness”

The post was accompanied by an emoji of a rainbow flag, as well as an image entitled: ‘Can men get ovarian cancer?’ along with the answer: “Anyone with ovaries, regardless of gender identity, can be at risk of ovarian cancer.

“Additionally all genders can carry a BRCA gene fault or Lynch syndrome - which would potentially mean their children would be at a higher risk of ovarian cancer.”'

You long for the light bulb moment where it is realised that 'woman' is not a malleable abstract concept but a synonym for 'anyone with ovaries' and a 101 other defining attributes that exist in objective reality.

Lol. This just in: anyone with ovaries can get ovarian cancer.

At any rate, presumably this is all meant to tacitly affirm the mantra (that accompanies the usual "women" one by implication); i.e. "trans men are men". Acceptance of which, of course, means that "men can get ovarian cancer."

It really is totally loopy. I'd love to know how big the silent majority is on this topic: my guess is "absolutely huge." But it's one of the most pernicious elements of our age that the rules of online engagement make the minority seem huge and powerful, and their opinions seem self-evident and accepted. And now modern HR is infected, you certainly wouldn't want to express disagreement in the workplace, or indeed any public arena; including, horrifically, education at all levels.