Despite the final score

[Greenman]

The Hibs laddies pissed all over the Hun Prima Donnas

The cry was no defenders

[Smurf]

Originally Posted by Greenman

The Hibs laddies pissed all over the Hun Prima Donnas

The cry was no defenders

Anyone hear Chick 'Ha huh ha huh' Young say on radio to the ex Scotland Manager who shat on his country something along the lines of "Obviously conditions were such that it was never going to be a day for passing football.."

So you didn't watch the Hibs Chick?

[PILTONSTANY]

Originally Posted by Greenman

The Hibs laddies pissed all over the Hun Prima Donnas

The cry was no defenders

After just watching the highlights,Your in goals next week and the ref should be shot for the sending off

[Smurf]

Originally Posted by PILTONSTANY

After just watching the highlights,Your in goals next week and the ref should be shot for the sending off

Mcneil at fault for how many?

[Grant1875]

Originally Posted by Smurf

Mcneil at fault for how many?

First thoughts both the free kicks. But seeing the highlights, maybe just 1 (the second one) First one seemed to come off someone's heed??

[PILTONSTANY]

Originally Posted by Smurf

Mcneil at fault for how many?

2,he dived completely the wrong way for the 1st and for the 3rd it was like he wasnae watching the ball.
2nd goal was a good finish,Martis at fault if anything.

[Grant1875]

Originally Posted by PILTONSTANY

2,he dived completely the wrong way for the 1st and for the 3rd it was like he wasnae watching the ball.
2nd goal was a good finish,Martis at fault if anything.

Adam's second was Simon Brown all over. McNeil was away fur a pie and bovril then decided to rush back when Adam hit it.

[The Hibby Pirate]

I haven't seen the goals on TV yet, but the first was one of those free kicks that the keeper needs to be set to save the touch from incoming forwards, then nobody touched it and it curled in at the far post. I thought we should have had someone on the post, given where the free kick was. The third is completely down to McNeill.

At the second I think Martis was left 2 on 1, he had to go to Novo who then slipped in Hutton (I expected him to make a total arse of it ).

[Greenmachine]

Originally Posted by The Hibby Pirate

I haven't seen the goals on TV yet, but the first was one of those free kicks that the keeper needs to be set to save the touch from incoming forwards, then nobody touched it and it curled in at the far post. I thought we should have had someone on the post, given where the free kick was. The third is completely down to McNeill.

At the second I think Martis was left 2 on 1, he had to go to Novo who then slipped in Hutton (I expected him to make a total arse of it ).

Rangers second goal came about because Hibs had so many players in the Rangers half that we were caught short at the back as they hit us on the break. It was the best piece of play the huns produced in the whole game TBH. McNeil's biggest problem is that he doesn't communicate very well with his defenders. He should have organised the wall better and had someone covering the near post with the huns third goal. I still think potentially he is a very good goalkeeper, but he has quite a bit to learn and we cannot afford to have such a rookie goalkeeper as first choice next season.

[wee 162]

Originally Posted by kennyc

Ive not seen the highlights on tv yet, and surprised no-one has mentioned this but......................if my eyes werent deceiving me, the foul against a ball being kicked against a Hibs players arm (think it was S. Whittaker), was not intentional, meaning this was an indirect free-kick. C Adams kicked it directly into the net, goal or no goal????

Handball is always a direct free kick, but it has to be intentional for it to be a foul. It wasn't deliberate so it wasn't a foul. But if the ref chooses to interpret that as a foul why weren't we awarded a penalty for a handball in the box which was far more blatant and where the players arm was well away from his body

I'm being sarcastic of course. The reason why the ref made those decisions in those ways is of course because he is a cheating masonic hun-loving ****.

Oh aye, their second free kick was also not a foul. And the Boozy sending off, quite apart from being a joke decision, also gave me the opportunity for the first time in my life to see a ref so desperate to give a penalty that he was staring out the linesman to give him an indication that it was in the box. I could also mention Fletcher getting booked for persistent fouling for what the ref indicated was his third foul (I have no idea what one he was talking about when he pointed to the halfway line) whilst never even speaking to Boyd who had committed about 8 fouls by that point.

Decisions even themselves out we keep getting told. Well I reckon we are due to play the huns with 11 of their players sent off before the first whistle and then getting 25 penalties against them in that same game. That should account for the last couple of years, but we would have to keep doing it for about the next 10 years in every game for it to start coming close to the amount of injustices that have been perpetrated against us whilst playing these feckers.

[scaredyhibby]

Originally Posted by wee 162

Handball is always a direct free kick, but it has to be intentional for it to be a foul. It wasn't deliberate so it wasn't a foul. But if the ref chooses to interpret that as a foul why weren't we awarded a penalty for a handball in the box which was far more blatant and where the players arm was well away from his body

I'm being sarcastic of course. The reason why the ref made those decisions in those ways is of course because he is a cheating masonic hun-loving ****.

Oh aye, their second free kick was also not a foul. And the Boozy sending off, quite apart from being a joke decision, also gave me the opportunity for the first time in my life to see a ref so desperate to give a penalty that he was staring out the linesman to give him an indication that it was in the box. I could also mention Fletcher getting booked for persistent fouling for what the ref indicated was his third foul (I have no idea what one he was talking about when he pointed to the halfway line) whilst never even speaking to Boyd who had committed about 8 fouls by that point.

Decisions even themselves out we keep getting told. Well I reckon we are due to play the huns with 11 of their players sent off before the first whistle and then getting 25 penalties against them in that same game. That should account for the last couple of years, but we would have to keep doing it for about the next 10 years in every game for it to start coming close to the amount of injustices that have been perpetrated against us whilst playing these feckers.

Well said and you're not exagerrating