Rule Change - HibeesBounce.com

**StevieC** · 01-06-06, 13:47

"Now, anyone who holds influence at a club will be subject to possible SFA sanctions. "Anyone who is an owner of a football club, or who is a major shareholder, would come under our jurisdiction," said Taylor. "

I wonder why the SFA changed this rule?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

**JamieHibby** · 01-06-06, 13:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by StevieC

"Now, anyone who holds influence at a club will be subject to possible SFA sanctions. "Anyone who is an owner of a football club, or who is a major shareholder, would come under our jurisdiction," said Taylor. "

I wonder why the SFA changed this rule?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I think it is an excellent idea
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I thought he was going to become an official anyhoo, president Vlad
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

**Briant** · 01-06-06, 13:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by StevieC

"Now, anyone who holds influence at a club will be subject to possible SFA sanctions. "Anyone who is an owner of a football club, or who is a major shareholder, would come under our jurisdiction," said Taylor. "

I wonder why the SFA changed this rule?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I think it would be a shame to attempt to silence anyone just because they don't agree with SFA rules. It always cheers me to hear an interesting take on the current laws and their enforcers. For instance, what is wrong in playing a game again if your team get beat by a team of thugs who constantly foul them and the ref lets them away with it?

Ooooooooooh, here's a new smiley.....
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

**wee 162** · 01-06-06, 15:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by D.K

It's a bloody rotten idea to clamp down on dissent in any form and in my opinion is a neat reflection of the insecurity and inadequacy of the SFA
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

So you never booked anyone for dissent presumably?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

bigmanandy · 01-06-06, 17:07

Great idea by the SFA didnt think they had anythin in them

bumblebee · 01-06-06, 21:47

Freedom of speech is frowned upon by the SFA obviously!

Stupid new rule!!! Controversy and folk bitchin about it makes the game so entertaining!!

**JamieHibby** · 01-06-06, 21:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by bumblebee

Freedom of speech is frowned upon by the SFA obviously!

Stupid new rule!!! Controversy and folk bitchin about it makes the game so entertaining!!

aye but surely "Mad Vlad" continually gettin' clobbered by the SFA beaks could be quite funny
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

**StevieC** · 02-06-06, 09:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by D.K

It's a bloody rotten idea to clamp down on dissent in any form and in my opinion is a neat reflection of the insecurity and inadequacy of the SFA
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

So as a referee yourself you'd be quite happy for the governing body to do nothing when someone starts accusing you of cheating?

The SFA may be a bunch of tools (or should that be stools
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
) but they have to have some way of making "officials" accountable for their outbursts and they have to be seen to protecting their employees. The place would be chaos (at least more chaotic than the farce it is just now) if they didn't.

**SlovSam** · 02-06-06, 13:44

Vlad may be a meglomaniac with the ego a size of a submarine but what a breath of freash air he was with his comments last year.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

'The refs's are biased in favour of the Old Firm',
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
there is an insitutional corruption at the heart of the SFA in favour of the bigger clubs
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
there is a press campaign to destablise this club
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and all that rambling about ememy's within,without and shaking it all about
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Tremendous copy and quite a grain of truth in some of what he says and I hope he finds away around this procedural rule.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

**hibadelic** · 02-06-06, 14:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlovSam

Vlad may be a meglomaniac with the ego a size of a submarine but what a breath of freash air he was with his comments last year.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

'The refs's are biased in favour of the Old Firm',
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
there is an insitutional corruption at the heart of the SFA in favour of the bigger clubs
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
there is a press campaign to destablise this club
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and all that rambling about ememy's within,without and shaking it all about
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Tremendous copy and quite a grain of truth in some of what he says and I hope he finds away around this procedural rule.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I agree there is a grain of truth to what he says but it is amplified by a silo full of paranoia. I don't think the SFA have the balls to do anything about Vlads comments TBH. £3,000 fines aren't going to silence him.

**Briant** · 02-06-06, 14:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlovSam

Vlad may be a meglomaniac with the ego a size of a submarine but what a breath of freash air he was with his comments last year.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

'The refs's are biased in favour of the Old Firm',
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
there is an insitutional corruption at the heart of the SFA in favour of the bigger clubs
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
there is a press campaign to destablise this club
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and all that rambling about ememy's within,without and shaking it all about
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Tremendous copy and quite a grain of truth in some of what he says and I hope he finds away around this procedural rule.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Deja vu
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I seem to remember this conversation when Harry Potter made similar comments a while ago. The SFA will do SFA about bias towards the infirm.

01-06-06, 13:47	#1
StevieC Toon Army Radge Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Perth Age: 42 Posts: 1,877 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Rep Power: 8	Rule Change "Now, anyone who holds influence at a club will be subject to possible SFA sanctions. "Anyone who is an owner of a football club, or who is a major shareholder, would come under our jurisdiction," said Taylor. " I wonder why the SFA changed this rule? To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. __________________ But you know it ain't all about wealth. As long as you make a note to... ... express yourself! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Stevie Carr

01-06-06, 17:07	#5
bigmanandy A True Gadgie/Gadgess Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: The East Stand Age: 19 Posts: 4,660 Thanks: 9 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts Rep Power: 16	Re: Rule Change Great idea by the SFA didnt think they had anythin in them __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. We are hibernian fc , we hate jam tarts and we hate dundee we will fight wherever we will be, because we are the mental HFC To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. The only team to sing about, the only team to see, the only team in Edinburgh, HibernianFC To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. In your Gorgie slums, you rake the bucket for something to eat, you find a dead rat and you think its a treat, in your Gorgie Slums To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Capital Greens Needs You

01-06-06, 21:47	#6
bumblebee Bounced Out! Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Currie Age: 28 Posts: 1,212 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Rep Power: 0	Re: Rule Change Freedom of speech is frowned upon by the SFA obviously! Stupid new rule!!! Controversy and folk bitchin about it makes the game so entertaining!! __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. THE PEOPLE'S PRINCESS Forever in our Hearts RIP

02-06-06, 13:44	#9
SlovSam Radge Flag Owner and Private Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Usually Edinburgh. Posts: 3,026 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Rep Power: 15	Re: Rule Change Vlad may be a meglomaniac with the ego a size of a submarine but what a breath of freash air he was with his comments last year. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 'The refs's are biased in favour of the Old Firm', To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. there is an insitutional corruption at the heart of the SFA in favour of the bigger clubs To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. there is a press campaign to destablise this club To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. and all that rambling about ememy's within,without and shaking it all about To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . Tremendous copy and quite a grain of truth in some of what he says and I hope he finds away around this procedural rule. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. __________________ 'Football is the most important of life's least important things' Ariggo Sachi.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
New rule in the highway code.	stickyRicky	COWSHED	29	29-09-07 00:00
Freeland and the diving rule	Stanton Warrior	General HIBS Chat	12	25-09-07 12:02
SPL under 21 rule	johnthehibee	General HIBS Chat	7	20-08-07 06:18
6 second rule	G MANSON79	General HIBS Chat	13	01-12-06 19:46
What's your 'leaving do' rule?	Northern Ireland Hibby	COWSHED	18	02-10-06 20:26