First penalty

[wee 162]

So did anyone actually see any contact at all there? I certainly didn't.

[Dr Shrink]

Originally Posted by wee 162

So did anyone actually see any contact at all there? I certainly didn't.

It probably looked like there was contact from the ref's view; but your point is sound.

No contact.

[GloryGlory]

Definetly no penalty. I'm not sure about the 2nd one, Possibly it was but still he was looking for it so hes getting nothing from me.

[Smurf]

No contact.

But then Scotsport obviously don't do 'No Contact' hence they show no Nakamura dives..
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[GloryGlory]

Originally Posted by Smurf

No contact.

But then Scotsport obviously don't do 'No Contact' hence they show no Nakamura dives..
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Was it just me or was Hibs' dominance in the first half hard to notice while watching those highlights
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Quite a few chances missed out.

[©stretch]

I never saw any. Melony gets his shot away, and then falls down because he slipped getting the shot away.

The second one he beats Whittaker, and then sticks his leg at Whittakers right leg, and then goes doon.

Quickly skipped over the Killen offside decision
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and then never discussed it.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
And then they dinnae even show the incident where we could have had a penalty but Ivan stays on his feet. Aye Old Firm bias is alive and well in Cowcaddens.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[Greenmachine]

The first one was touch and go, but from the referees view it would have looked a stone waller. The second one was clear enough IMO. I reckon Hibs would have definately won if we had got the second goal. Our defence looked terrible again with the second goal, yet another goal conceded from a set-piece. I counted 6 Hibs players in the penalty box and yet their centre-half strides forward and gets a free shot at goal from 8 yards.

[©stretch]

Originally Posted by Greenmachine

The first one was touch and go, but from the referees view it would have looked a stone waller. The second one was clear enough IMO. I reckon Hibs would have definately won if we had got the second goal. Our defence looked terrible again with the second goal, yet another goal conceded from a set-piece. I counted 6 Hibs players in the penalty box and yet their centre-half strides forward and gets a free shot at goal from 8 yards.

Aye the marking was poor.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Someone flicks it on, petrov misses it, and the big donkey still has time to pick his spot without a challenge. It's called schoolboy defending
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[hibbymick]

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Yep, looked like Paloney lost his footing and was going down when Whittaker made his sliding challenge.. and I AM STILL IN DISBELIEF how Nakodiving still never got booked!!

[pedroorange]

Originally Posted by Greenmachine

The first one was touch and go, but from the referees view it would have looked a stone waller. The second one was clear enough IMO. I reckon Hibs would have definately won if we had got the second goal. Our defence looked terrible again with the second goal, yet another goal conceded from a set-piece. I counted 6 Hibs players in the penalty box and yet their centre-half strides forward and gets a free shot at goal from 8 yards.

I agree but then the ref was half the pitch away, Freeland is a fat, unfit joke of a ref, miles away from every major decision looking at the highlights

[wee 162]

Originally Posted by Greenmachine

The first one was touch and go, but from the referees view it would have looked a stone waller. The second one was clear enough IMO. I reckon Hibs would have definately won if we had got the second goal. Our defence looked terrible again with the second goal, yet another goal conceded from a set-piece. I counted 6 Hibs players in the penalty box and yet their centre-half strides forward and gets a free shot at goal from 8 yards.

From my view from at least a hundred yards away on the terracing I thought it wasn't a penalty. The referee was closer, at a better angle, and probably has considerably better eyesight than me...

[CadgeMac]

i would still say the first was no penalty but the second was, i though killen was onside and nobody on scotsport even mentioned it

[EasterRoadEH6]

didnt see contact either - fecking farce
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[Greenmachine]

The referee saw a tackle from the back by Whittaker on Maloney and that's why the penalty was given. It was also the reason Whittaker was booked as a tackle from the back is a booking offence no matter where it is on the pitch.

As I said, it looks inconclusive on the TV replay which the referee cannot see, but I would have probably have given a penalty if I had been the referee in those circumstances.

[Swoosh]

They never showed any of the decision the lines man gave for offside either
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


They showed the goal but there was at least another 3 in which hibs were not off side.
Think the linesman had a nervous twitch or somethin
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[Greenscratch]

Originally Posted by Swoosh

They never showed any of the decision the lines man gave for offside either
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


They showed the goal but there was at least another 3 in which hibs were not off side.
Think the linesman had a nervous twitch or somethin
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Totally agree wi that. Hit nail on the head. When Killens goal was chalked off I watched that linesman like a hawk. He flagged Killen twice - who ran from behind the defense - WHEN THE BALL WAS KICKED - timed his run to perfection and was flagged
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

The boy isn't FAST ENOUGH!!!! Shocking decision. At half time I said to the boys around me that this linesman is gonna cost us - the FIRST time smellic pumped the ball forward in the 2nd half (almost identical to the 3 decisions the swoosh feller states in his post), the linesman let it go. Result corner. Result Goal. I swear I saw a smellic tattoo on his arm frae the west upper!
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Still, many positives to take from the match - and good comments from Sir Tony - " lets win our last 4 games before the split".

With a bit of self belief we can still end this season on a high. We still MUST believe that 2nd place is up for grabs.

Come on the cabbage.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[markcarse]

No contact same old celtic all ways cheatin Easter Road - Heaven is a place in Leith!!
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[snoots]

Originally Posted by wee 162

So did anyone actually see any contact at all there? I certainly didn't.

I didn't see any contact.

Originally Posted by Greenscratch

- the FIRST time smellic pumped the ball forward in the 2nd half (almost identical to the 3 decisions the swoosh feller states in his post), the linesman let it go. Result corner. Result Goal.

Notice that Snotsport didn't show the build-up to winning that corner, just the corner itself.

[alnewhaven]

Originally Posted by Lord_Notsnooty

Notice that Snotsport didn't show the build-up to winning that corner, just the corner itself.

Watched it on Setanta on Saturday evening ....from the East I thought Zurawaski (sp?) was offside in the run up to the corner. Messrs Hately and Brown also thought there was a hiint of offside ...and in respect of the Killen 'goal' felt it was at first, marginal then on second viewing, he was level. Neither of these made it to the Celtic 'love-fest' on Monday night.

Another quote from Hateley re Nakamura, along the lines of 'he's light weight, so goes down very easily....annoys a lot of players'

[Jack_hibernian]

im sure he got the ball and the wee prick Maloney fell.
hope the cabbage and ribs get rite intae them at smelltic park next time
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[Young_hibee]

on the first penalty maloney went down before he was even tackled, the second one also looked like a dive but am not too sure.

[dunney_hibee_91]

for the first penalty maloney had already got his shot away and he was definatley lookin for the second because there wasnt much contact
looks like the refs got it wrong again (surprise surprise)
C`MON THE HIBEES
we`ll support you ever more :brocban