Quote:
|
So you are quoting a polemical book whereas the Swedish penal code has no mention of it. Actually, what gets me about it is the smeary innuendo that you run with this stuff.Do you understand what evidence and facts actually are? Very revealing that you see dealing in facts as 'pish'.
You said that child sex laws don't apply to muslims in Sweden. That's a very bold claim and one that realy needs to be shown to stand up - don't you think? And here's the thing - if you demonstrate that Swedish law allows this then it would rightly be condemned and the proponents of the legislation should be hounded out of office. If it isn't true, then you are speading the very stuff that stokes up the BNP. And once the lie is out there it will never go away. But that can't be right - in EGB world it is only ever liberals and the left that stoke up racial hatred. So that's why facts are important and relying on one book by a polemicist can't be enough.
So...
|
yawn.
so here he have it; the contentless archie reply.
are you saying the book is making it up - despite the evidence in all these links? what evidence do you have for that? that in itself is a fairly serious accusation. could any book explore these issues without you labelling it in this way? or do we have a circular situation with no way out?
why are you ignoring the IHT reference to it still going on in germany? why are you ignoring the point about polygamy?
bottom line archie, the substance of the point i made; that we have two track laws in europe, has been backed up with plenty evidence.
but instead of then responding to the point as challenged, you ignore all that stuff and throw up chaff and hyperbole - sheesh, talk about smears and innuendo.
yes; i understand what facts and evidence are - they're the things:
- i provide and you don't
- that you ignore when provided
- that you use as a trolling and avoidance mechanism; we're not in a bloody university library here, and the merits of google notwithstanding, we don't have all info at the world at our finger tips - how the feck am i going to be able to analyse the full swedish penal code in a chat with a message board troll? (incidentally can you quote the relevant sections to back up your statement - oh and given the context i'd also like a revision history for the last 5 years or so)
you've been provided with ample links for our purpose. and your endless requests for every conversation to be peppered with citations becomes insufferably tedious when it's all one way and you don't respond when you get them anyway.
so, come on archie - engage with the point or quit trolling. oh and it's the latter of course, that i described as pish - troll.
do you have a point to make?
ps - what are you dribbling on about that i suggest only the left stoke racial hatred? another substanceless statement. what is closer to the mark is that i point out that they
do stoke it, which is necessary as the left often don't recognise it in themselves as they do in others. moreover, i feel it's worth point out to y'all that you are the BNP's best recruiting sergeants, which is the opinion of some of it's own members.