Quote:
|
Really?
'According to the coroner Mr Paul is seen walking down some stairs, bending down to tie his shoelaces, then standing up and walking away with no problems of balance - not the kind of behaviour of someone who is drunk.'
Maybe with the inquest we'll get the truth.
|
The jury has already heard that blood tests show Paul was over the drink-drive limit when he crashed into a pillar in an underpass, with the couple in the back of the car, in the early hours of August 31 1997.
The coroner is steering the jury away from conspiracy theories....
The coroner said the decision was ultimately taken by the princess's personal secretary, Michael Gibbins, and her former royal protection officer, Colin Tebbutt, after the French authorities had given approval, because the princess was being left in a hospital room rather than being taken to the morgue on the far side of the site for fear that photographers would take pictures of the journey.
The coroner said: "In deciding whether [it] was part of a conspiracy to conceal pregnancy, you will probably wish to ask yourselves how many people must have been party to that decision."
He was similarly cautious in discussing another of the conspiracy claims, that the crash was engineered by British secret service agents at the Paris embassy. Lord Justice Scott Baker said that although Secret Intelligence Service officers were seconded to the embassy, their role was to liaise with their French opposite numbers on matters such as counterterrorism and organised international crime. The embassy had been unaware that the princess was even in Paris. He added: "In other words, they had other and bigger fish to fry. They were not concerned with the movements of dignitaries."
Maybe he is part of the conspiracy
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.